PC 042308 - Laserfiche WebLink

and act upon the judgment. He believed there was sufficient information and opinion on the facts of the case that the Planning Commission and staff could clearly take a position on this issue. He hoped that the City would also be able to stop another citizen in Pleasanton from experiencing the problems he encountered. He noted that Pleasanton would not be the first City to put rules in place which govern the location and use of sports courts. He was aware of one development in the Vineyard Corridor that specifically precludes the ability to install sports courts on the properties and added that was a CC&R approved by the City. He stated that he did not believe his request was unreasonable and asked that the City follow through on the work discussed in 2007 and make sure the proposals were in place. He asked that the City recognize the decision of the Court that a sports court placed as closely to the property as this example would be a nuisance that should be regulated. Chair Blank noted that the Planning Commission would not be permitted to discuss an item that is not on the agenda, but suggested that it be discussed under Matters Initiated by Commission Memher~ RVs on Private PropertX Douglas Farmer inquired whether there was any future plan to address the parking of RVs on private property and residential lots. He noted that the minutes from a meeting nearly a year ago addressed this issue regarding a conditional use permit, with the possibility of updating the law. He recalled that Commissioner Narum noted that there were many inconsistencies in the existing Code. He stated that he would like to see a discussion on that issue. Chair Blank noted that if the Commission wished to agendize an item, it would be done under Matters Initiated by Commission Members. In response to an inquiry by Chair Blank regarding whether staff could respond to the status of the sports court or the RV parking ordinances, Ms. Harryman replied that she was not aware of the status of either ordinance. Chair Blank noted that the Commission could not debate or discuss those items because they had not been publicly noticed. If the Commission wished to agendize an item under Matters Initiated by Commission Members, it would then be publicly noticed. Mr. Farmer wished to urge the Commission to place that item on the agenda. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Ms. Decker advised that staff would like to request that Item S.a., PUD-73, Steve Maestas and Mike Carey, be pulled from the Consent Calendar and that it be the last item heard. She noted that the applicant was aware of staff's request to do so and was agreeable to this change. She noted that there may be individuals who wished to speak and may not be able to wait until then. She noted that a request was being made in order to allow the staff planner to present the staff report but was unable to be present until later in the evening. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2008 Page 3 of 28