My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111208
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 111208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:50 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 111208
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan added that in terms of if Mr. Pfund is nearing the end and the State is not <br />moving, at some point along that timeline, Mr. Pfund would need to make the decision <br />as to whether or not this is a lost cause orwhether or not he should apply for an <br />amendment to these conditions. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the modification to Condition No. 10 could say thatwithin seven <br />months of approval, Tri-Valley Martial Arts would obtain a childcare license from the <br />State Department of Social Services. He further inquired, if he does not obtain the <br />childcare license and continue business underthe rest of the conditions of approval, if <br />the City could revoke the CUP on the basis that he did not obtain the childcare license. <br />Ms. Seto said yes to both inquiries. <br />Mr. Dolan inquired whether this would be a revocation of the CUP, and Ms. Seto <br />confirmed that Code Enforcement would not be needed as the use would expire as <br />conditioned. <br />Chair Blank stated that if the condition is not being met, Code Enforcement would <br />officially have to inform the applicant, giving them the opportunity to correct, with all the <br />timeframes and ministerial processes. Ms. Seto stated that technically, the Code <br />Enforcement Officer would need to go out and see that they were actually operating and <br />not meeting that condition; then there would be a possibility for the applicant to ask for a <br />modification of that condition. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the Code enforcement process would be required to issue an <br />initial letterthat the business is in violation and should shut down, followed by 30 days <br />to correct the violations. Ms. Seto replied that it would depend on the type of violation: <br />some are correctable and would most likely require only one letter. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the letter would be the notice of revocation or actual revocation, <br />as the Commission has had situations like this in the past where there have been <br />egregious Code violations and the Commission has had to go through this process. <br />Ms. Decker replied that it depends greatly upon how the condition is crafted. She <br />explained that if the condition is craft where this approval shall expire seven months <br />from the date of approval unless childcare license is applied for and obtained, then this <br />conditional use permit automatically sunsets and expires, and no Code enforcement <br />would be necessary; the business owner would be contacted, and staff would indicate <br />that his conditional use permit has expired. <br />Chair Blank suggested using Mr. Dolan's verbiage that "Within seven months of <br />approval, Tri-Valley Martial Arts shall obtain a childcare license from the State <br />Department of Social Services. If the childcare license is not obtained and business is <br />continued under the rest of the conditions of approval, the City could revoke the <br />conditional use permit on the basis that the applicant did not obtain the childcare <br />license." <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2008 Page 25 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.