Laserfiche WebLink
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. PCUP-229, John Pfund, Tri-Valley Martial Arts Academy <br />Application for a conditional use permit to allow the operation of the following <br />at 1262 Quarry Lane, Suite A, in the Valley Business Park: (1) a martial <br />arts/childcare facility, Monday through Friday, from 11:30 a.m. to 6:15 p.m.; <br />(2) full-time childcare program camps during school breaks and holidays; and <br />(3) evening martial arts classes, Monday through Friday, from 6:45 p.m. to <br />9:00 p.m. Zoning for the property is PUD-I (Planned Unit Development - <br />Industrial) District <br />This item was continued to a future meeting. <br />b. PAP-123, Greg and Lisa Johnston, Appellants (PDR-715, SJ, Applicant) <br />Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an application for design <br />review for rear yard improvements. Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 <br />(Single-Family Residential) District. <br />Chair Blank noted that since this item was tabled, a motion is needed to take it off <br />the table. <br />Commissioner Narum moved to take PAP-123 (PDR-715) off the table. <br />Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Olson. <br />The motion passed, and the item was taken off the table. <br />Mr. Dolan presented the staff report and indicated that at the end of the last meeting, <br />there was some Commission agreement with respect to the conditions of approval. <br />He stated that staff offered to try and capture the discussion in a condition and has <br />prepared some conditions with alternatives, which was included in the packet. He <br />noted that one issue not included in the memo and which he had earlier discussed <br />with Chair Blank is the height of the wall. He stated that the Commission had been <br />interested in limiting the height of the wall to four feet, which he understood the <br />Commission opted for as this would be the height limit that could be achieved <br />without a building permit and having the plans reviewed. He noted that since there <br />was a building permit granted, that the retaining wall had been inspected, and that <br />the plans were approved, this issue would be a moot point and a condition on that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 8 of 41 <br />