My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092408
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 092408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:10 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/24/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
October 22nd, and the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch <br />Project is anticipated to be scheduled for October 29t" and into November. She <br />indicated that staff did not have a specific date with respect to the other Staples <br />Ranch projects. <br />Chair Blank moved that the Planning Commission agree to expedite the PFund <br />application and support the scheduling of a special meeting for that purpose. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired what "expedite" meant. Chair Blank replied that he <br />was willing to hold a special meeting sometime before November. <br />Ms. Decker stated that staff would look at available dates and would send an email <br />to the Commissioners to check on their availability, <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if having only three or four Commissioners present <br />would be acceptable; the Commissioners agreed. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Fox and Olson. <br />The motion passed. <br />b. Actions of the Citv Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />Commissioner O'Connor referred to an item on the Supplemental Actions Report, <br />PADR-1935, and stated that he did not realize residential solar panels needed <br />approval. He inquired if the reason was because they were tilted or if all solar panels <br />need to come through the Zoning Administrator. <br />Ms. Decker replied that this particular application required an administrative design <br />review because the solar panels are tilted. She added that the Code allows <br />over-the-counter approvals for panels that are flush on the roof. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if neighbors need to be notified for the tilted solar <br />panels, and Ms. Decker said yes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 40 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.