My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092408
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 092408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:10 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/24/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092408
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
suggested that the Commission follows its decision to uphold the appeal with <br />amending the conditions of the Zoning Administrator's approval. <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that she would also like to require a detailed specific <br />landscape drawing that is drawn to scale and in substantial conformance to the <br />Exhibit A landscape picture dated April 8, 2008, maintain the conditions of Tract <br />5835 except as modified by these conditions, and to amend Condition No. 3 to <br />enable a faster growth of plantings. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the Commission could put a performance statement in the <br />condition similar to the way staff wrote in its memo and include whatever year the <br />Commission would like. He added that staff would review those species to ensure <br />they have a growth rate that would accomplish the purpose within the desired <br />timeframe. <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that she would like to include a 35-foot setback in <br />the rear yard on which above-ground structures would be prohibited and that a <br />four-foot high berm be installed. <br />Commissioner Fox requested the addition of a condition that the applicant be <br />required to submit engineered drawings to ensure the stability, safety, and proper <br />drainage of the berm, subject to City review and approval; that no lighting be place <br />on the pool that are directed toward the neighbors' houses; and that all conditions of <br />PDR-715 stay in force provided they are not in conflict with these conditions. <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that Conditions Nos. 4, 6, and 10 of PDR-715 would be deleted. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Commissioner Pearce whether she wanted to keep the <br />wall in the same place or remove it. Commissioner Pearce replied that she was <br />concerned about the impact of moving the wall and that she would like to add a <br />condition to potentially vegetate the wall to soften its appearance. <br />Chair Blank agreed with adding vegetation to the wall, which he felt is a <br />compromise. <br />Commissioner Pearce revised her motion to include the proposed <br />amendments as follows: (1) the applicant shall provide a detailed landscape <br />drawing drawn to scale by a landscape architect and approved by staff which <br />conforms substantially to the Exhibit A landscape plan dated April 8, 2008; <br />(2) all conditions of approval of Tract 5835 shall remain in full force and effect <br />except as modified by these conditions; (3) a performance statement shall be <br />included in which staff would review the plant species to ensure they have a <br />growth rate which accomplishes the landscaping screening goal within a <br />three-year time period; (4) the installation of any above-ground permanent <br />structures, such as play structures, sports courts, gazebos, decks, etc. is <br />prohibited within the rear 35 feet of the yard; (5) a landscaped, four-foot tall <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 24, 2008 Page 19 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.