My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072308
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 072308
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:51 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 12:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 072308
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired what PMS-72, Sarich was about. Ms. Decker <br />replied that the PUD was approved by the City Council and in order to implement <br />that PUD, the Minor Subdivision Map was submitted to the City. She noted that <br />this is a Zoning Administrator action because the subdivision is for less than five <br />parcels. She stated that a public hearing was held at the Staff Review Board <br />with Zoning Administrator, and no one attended except the architect, engineers, <br />and the applicants. She indicated that the application met the Subdivision Map <br />Act requirements and was approved. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if this is for the second unit. Ms. Decker said yes <br />and added that the second unit wrapped around the existing home with the <br />proposed future garage, and the remainder is the 19 acres on the knoll where the <br />new home would be built. <br />Chair Blank inquired if the subdivision was discussed at the PUD process. <br />Ms. Decker replied that the subdivision is not part of the PUD process but that <br />the plans showed the creation of a one-acre parcel for the existing home which <br />the Sariches are entitled to, and the 19 acres which would encompass the <br />remainder of the site. She noted that the applicants are entitled to six additional <br />units on the lower area, which they are not developing at this time and on which <br />vineyards will be planted instead. She added that there are four benches that go <br />up the hill from Old Vineyard Trail. <br />Chair Blank confirmed with staff that the appeal period expires 15 days from last <br />Thursday. <br />Commissioner Pearce requested that the Commission be provided copies of the <br />written application, minutes, and conditions of approval prior to the expiration of <br />the appeal period. Ms. Decker clarified that an appeal of a minor subdivision is <br />related only to the Subdivision Map Act and does not encompass anything other <br />than that. <br />Commissioner Narum recalled that the PUD conditions required any changes to <br />the house design to return to the Planning Commission. Ms. Decker confirmed <br />that was correct. <br />In response to Commissioner O'Connor's inquiry regarding whether the 19-acre <br />and one-acre subdivision were presented in the PUD staff report, Ms. Decker <br />said yes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2008 Page 24 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.