Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Narum referred to the changes to the Mediterranean style house <br />on page 14 and confirmed they were included in Condition of Approval No. 18.b. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that square footage for the homes at 1,900 to 3,000 <br />seemed large for seniors with cone- ortwo-person household. Mr. Otto said <br />there are various types of senior houses; some are small and some are larger, <br />single family homes. He added that the developer typically will conduct market <br />analysis, and staff looks at the lots, floor area ration (FAR), and setbacks for the <br />homes and found their sizes to be acceptable and similar to other home sizes <br />approved in the City. <br />Commissioner Fox questioned if they compared to any other senior housing the <br />City has approved in the past, and Ms. Decker said the actual sizing of the <br />homes was not related to any particular standard that has been established as <br />far as minimums or maximums for senior housing. She noted that the idea <br />behind this development is that it is more age-restricted and not necessarily <br />size-restricted. She stated that a senior may have a desire to have a larger <br />home just as in any other market place. She added that the State has not <br />provided any standard for size maximums, nor has the City adopted any size <br />maximums or minimums for this particular use. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if a caretaker who is a relative of the senior who <br />happens to have a child would be allowed to live in the residence. Mr. Otto <br />replied that the applicant is proposing to follow the State Civil Code with respect <br />to the age limitations of the project, which is included in the staff report; however, <br />a health care provider could live with the senior without a restriction on age. He <br />added that if that provider has a child or children, they could also stay. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to the mitigated Negative Declaration and noted that <br />under Land Use Planning, Items A and B are checked as having no impact. She <br />questioned why, given this is a gated community and the General Plan <br />discourages gated communities, staff did not check this as an impact. Mr. Otto <br />replied that the project is at the edge of the City, and staff felt a gated community <br />at that location would not physically divide the City. He noted that the road into <br />the site, if not gated, would dead-end inside the project. <br />Commissioner Fox questioned if seniors living in the Ironwood Apartments would <br />be allowed to use the facilities in the complex. Mr. Otto replied that the facility is <br />proposed for only those within the development and that the seniors in the <br />apartments have use of the cabana and pool facilities in their existing <br />development. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to pedestrian access and noted that there are no <br />sidewalks planned for the roads that end in cul-de-sacs. She inquired why staff <br />supported this. Mr. Otto replied that the sidewalks are not located throughout the <br />development and that they extend for only a portion in the cul-de-sac areas and <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 9 of 39 <br />