Laserfiche WebLink
lane is being utilized and not as much of a clear function of how an intersection <br />operates. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue now have <br />HCM LOS E on page 1 of the Existing Plus Approved Plus Project PM peak. <br />She questioned why the boxes in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are not <br />checked when it conflicts with the General Plan, since HCM LOS D is accepted <br />in the Downtown. Mr. Tassano replies that the mitigation has been established <br />and the fees pay for the mitigation. He added that staff would not require this <br />project to construct this mitigation as it is a very small-scale improvement; staff <br />holds larger-scale projects to doing full construction. <br />Commissioner Fox questioned what the difference was between small- and <br />large-scale construction. Mr. Tassano replied that small-scale adds 25 trips or <br />one-second of delay to an intersection. He noted that the City Council has in the <br />past moved forward with approving projects of this nature as there is future <br />mitigation planned for this intersection. <br />Commissioner Fox questioned the status of the Valley Avenue and Stanley <br />Boulevard intersection, which had ICM LOS F. Mr. Tassano replied that this will <br />not be improved as a result of what the ICM looks at, but the City does have <br />improvements to be constructed by Ponderosa with a free westbound right-turn <br />lane. He added that there will also be a third eastbound through lane at that <br />intersection. <br />Commissioner Narum referred to Table 2 on page 8, ID No. 5, Busch <br />Road/Ironwood Drive, and noted that it looks like as with Currently Approved <br />Projects plus this new project, traffic gets better, which she did not believe was <br />obvious. Mr. Tassano replied that the entire table of existing conditions is not an <br />optimized intersection. He noted that staff put the numbers in, and it could <br />actually be a C if the lengths of time for a left turn are wrong. He stated that <br />when considering traffic volumes, staff looks at the delay per vehicle. He <br />explained that if a large volume of traffic is going to turn right and it is a free right- <br />turn movement and there is no delay, once that right turn is made and the vehicle <br />goes through the intersection, there would be zero delay for that vehicle. He <br />added that if there are only 100 vehicles that have already gone through that <br />intersection, and staff adds another 100 right-turn vehicles and they all get to turn <br />for free, there would now be 200 vehicles and no delay has been added. He <br />noted that in this sense, the overall average delay per vehicle has actually <br />dropped. He stated that this is usually pretty minor and that A and B <br />intersections usually operate so well that minor variations do not affect them. <br />Commissioner Narum referred to page 9 of the report, stating the traffic <br />engineering consultant recommends that stops signs as well as a warning sign <br />be installed leading into Reimers Drive. She stated that she did not see this in <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 12 of 39 <br />