My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061108
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 061108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:33 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/11/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 061108
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
noted that if this building were limited to three stories, with the right parking <br />structure, the neighbors would not be as concerned with the overflow parking. <br />He stated that mediation could be very successful and would like to see that <br />process go forward. <br />Commissioner Olson disclosed that he spoke with Ron Williamson on the phone <br />on June 10, 2008, for about 20 minutes. As staff indicated, he noted that <br />substantial conformance would be based on appearance and operations. He <br />noted that a better appearance could be achieved and that a senior living facility <br />should be placed on this property. He indicated that four stories might be <br />pushing the envelope. He added that he could not come up with substantial <br />conformance when he looked at the nature of this operation versus what was <br />anticipated in 1985. He noted that it was reasonable that in the past 23 years, <br />some could argue a lack of conformity in general, based on changes that have <br />occurred. He indicated that he did not understand how this could go forward <br />without an EIR. He stated that he believed this project should go on this property <br />but that there should be a mediation process. He stated that he could not vote <br />for conformance in order to get to a mediation process as he believed there was <br />no substantial conformance in this case. He inquired why ingress and egress <br />could not occur off of Foothill Road rather than Pleasant Hill Road. He noted that <br />it seemed possible that athree-story design could be put on the property such <br />that the third story would be up against Foothill Road and away from the other <br />road; entry to and exit from the property would occur from Foothill Road and <br />actually go under part of the building to get into the main part of the property. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she had difficulty finding substantial <br />conformance based on the operation. She stated that this was a good location <br />for a senior facility but the project evolved with time. She disclosed that she met <br />with the Williamsons and met with Mr. Shemp earlier in the day. She understood <br />that there was a willingness to compromise in the neighborhood, which led her to <br />suggest the mediation process. She stated that she would vote for conformance <br />if a condition were to be included to use a mediation process because she <br />believed this was the right use at the location. <br />Commissioner O'Connor disclosed that he met with the Williamsons. <br />Commissioner Fox disclosed that she met with the Williamsons. <br />Chair Blank stated that he believed this item should have been a workshop rather <br />than a hearing. He noted that senior living had evolved in the past 23 years, as <br />had the environment. He noted that it was disingenuous to suggest that one side <br />of the equation had evolved but that the other had become frozen in time. He <br />stated that the principles of a Community of Character did not fit with the <br />application yet. He was very concerned about the operations and noted that he <br />had an incidence of Alzheimer's in his family. He added that he did not see how <br />the required care for someone in the late stages of Alzheimer's could be <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 11, 2008 Page 23 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.