Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jeung stated that his presentation is intended to be a broad summary of all the various topics <br />in the Draft EIR and to show how the environmental impacts are analyzed and classified, <br />basically as "LTS" orLess-than-Significant, "PS" or Potentially Significant, and "SU" or <br />Significant and Unavoidable. He noted that it is important to look at the "SU" column as these <br />are situations in which the impacts cannot be pushed below the threshold. <br />Mr. Jeung noted three areas with significant impacts: (1) Aesthetics and Visual Quality, which <br />addresses the change in the appearance and visual character of the site where current open space <br />is converted to a mixture of urban uses; (2) Air quality, which considers the number of <br />automobile trips associated with the project and results in emissions that contribute to air quality <br />problems; and (3) Transportation, which consists of intersection impacts in other jurisdictions. <br />He noted that the intersection impacts that may not be resolved occur outside the City of <br />Pleasanton, at intersections in Dublin and Livermore. He noted that the solution proposed in the <br />Draft EIR to address this specifically refers to an interagency cooperative agreement where <br />Pleasanton can work with other cities and come up with an approach that would identify the <br />cities' fair share contribution to impacts in other jurisdictions. <br />Mr. Jeung then addressed other impacts that have some significance and how the mitigation <br />measures proposed to address those impacts. <br />• Visual quality -lights and glare from the automall, the community park, and the senior <br />care community center. The Draft EIR calls for very specific lighting plans that address, <br />among other things, the hours of operation, the light intensity in terms of footcandles, and <br />the height of light fixtures. <br />Air quality -exposure of the senior care community center and residences along freeway <br />to toxic air contaminants, which present issues with health risk. The mitigation calls for a <br />health risk assessment for any residential development within 500 feet of the freeway. It <br />acknowledges that the freeway may be widened. <br />Biology -potential for special status species listed by State and Federal governments, <br />such as the red-legged frog, the tiger salamander, and other species that have the potential <br />to occur on site, particularly in the Arroyo Mocha Mitigation measures are specifically <br />identified to reduce the impacts on those species through fencing, monitoring during <br />construction, training of construction workers, various environmental permits, and light <br />restrictions to avoid disturbance to species in the Arroyo Mocho. <br />• Hazards -potential concerns for the prof ect in terms of proximity to the Livermore <br />Airport. The Draft EIR identified the different types of airport safety zones. In <br />consultation with the Airport Land Use Commission, the site is not within the safety <br />zones, and the residential prof ect is consistent with criteria of those safety zones and is <br />outside the areas of concern. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 14, 2008 Page 6 of 14 <br />