My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031208
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 031208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:36:51 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
03/12/08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
No action was taken. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />a. Discussion of the types of projects to be placed on the Consent Calendar. <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />Director of Community Development Interview <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she and Commissioner O'Connor participated in the interview <br />boards for the new Director of Community Development. She saw a wide range of candidates <br />and felt that the City Manager took into serious consideration the input she and Commissioner <br />O'Connor provided from the Planning Commission perspective. <br />Commissioner O'Connor believed that the candidate placed highest by Commissioner Narum <br />and himself was hired. <br />Instructions for Overhead Projector <br />Chair Blank requested that instructions for the overhead prof ector be printed and posted. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />9. COMMUNICATIONS <br />Ms. Harryman wished to remind the Commissioners that they should keep due process <br />considerations in mind and that questions posed during the staff report should be restricted to <br />questions and not comments. The Commissioners' opinions should not be voiced until after the <br />public hearing has been completed. Although the Commissioners were aware that they had not <br />made a decision until the full review has been made, it was important from a due process <br />standpoint as well as the public's perception that only questions be posed at that time. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2008 Page 21 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.