My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031208
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 031208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:36:51 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
03/12/08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Blank noted that the statement on page 6 that was attributed to Mr. Roush was not made by <br />him. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she would not be present at the next meeting and wished to <br />submit her changes to staff. <br />Commissioner O'Connor arrived at this time. <br />b. February 27, 2008. <br />Commissioner Narum believed that the motion at the bottom of page 17 included an amendment <br />to add a condition for fencing on the west side of the project. <br />Ms. Decker replied that she would check the audio to confirm whether that was the case. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the first sentence of the third paragraph from the bottom on <br />page 18 should be modified to read as follows: "In response to an inquiry by Commissioner <br />Olson regarding how these lots met compared in size to The Preserve,..." <br />Commissioner Fox wished to ensure that it was clear that the roll call vote on page 15 was for <br />the motion on page 11, and inquired whether the motion should refer to that motion. Ms. Decker <br />replied that it was not the practice to provide those clarifications within the text of the minutes. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the second and third sentences of the seventh paragraph on <br />page 9 should be modified to read as follows: "He noted that the Environmental Impact Report <br />(EIR) stated that the vineyards in the Vineyard District would be irrigated by well water, ... He <br />believed there was justification to vacate the e€well rights...." <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the first sentence of the second paragraph under Urban <br />Growth Boundary on page 21 should be modified to read as follows: "Commissioner O'Connor <br />did not object to the lots being adjacent to ewe the UGB...." <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that sentence on the fifth paragraph under Urban Growth <br />Boundary on page 21 should be modified to read as follows: "Commissioner O'Connor <br />suggested that when the homes are designed on the lots, larger side yard setbacks be included to <br />enhance the view between the homes." <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that the first sentence of the fifth paragraph under Density on <br />page 21 should be modified to read as follows: "Acting Chair Pearce believed the staging area <br />was sufficient but had concerns about the private park as a public amenity. " She noted that she <br />did not have any concerns about the private parkin general. <br />Commissioner Fox noted a typo on the second modification under the first motion on page 11 <br />and requested that the word "will" be deleted. She added that Mr. Brozosky's name was <br />misspelled and requested that it be corrected. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2008 Page 2 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.