PC 031208 - Laserfiche WebLink

prevent someone from encroaching on that view. He believed the applicant had been very willing to be flexible when he was not legally required to do so. Commissioner Narum noted that she was not as concerned about the view as the welfare of the neighbor on the downhill side. Commissioner Fox concurred with Commissioner Narum's comment that the view was not an issue for her. She was concerned that the applicant considered this to be a second dwelling and a poolhouse and believed it should be placed closer to the primary residence. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: Commissioners Narum and Fox. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC-2008-12 denying PAP-117, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval of PADR-1762, and PC-208-13, recommending approval of PUD-99-09-02M to the City Council, were entered and adopted as motioned. A recess was called at 8:34 p.m. Chair Blank reconvened the meeting at 8:42 p.m. b. PDR-623, Scott and Shelly Adams Application for design review approval to: (1) demolish an existing one-story single- family home; and (2) to construct a new two-story single-family home with 8,325 square feet of living area, 2,215 square feet of attached garage area, and an attached 8,476-square-foot indoor tennis court on a 58,703-square-foot lot located at 2751 Crellin Road in Foxbrough Estates. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development -Low Density Residential) District. Mr. Pavan summarized the staff report and described the background, scope, and layout of the proposed project. Commissioner Fox noted that on page 15 of the staff report, there was a discussion on the General Plan Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environment regarding the noise level of up to 60 dB being "normally acceptable" for residential properties. She inquired whether there was a reduced noise level maximum that was required after 10:00 a.m. and before 7:00 a.m. Mr. Pavan replied that the language was taken directly from the City's noise ordinance, which stated that at no time can events exceed 60 dB per event at the property line. He believed that Commissioner Fox's question addressed nonresidential uses adjoining or in close proximity to residential uses; the lower noise standard must be followed at the property line. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2008 Page 10 of 22