My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022708
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 022708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:36:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 022708
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor was not generally in favor of gated communities but would <br />strongly support a gate for this community because it was more remote and not as visible <br />from the road. He believed there were some security issues that could be addressed by a <br />gate. In addition, he believed its proximity to the staging area made a gate desirable and <br />did not believe the neighborhood should be subjected to people driving through their <br />development. He believed it was important for the residents to have some privacy. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed with Commissioner O'Connor's comments. <br />Acting Chair Pearce noted that she was not generally supportive of gated communities <br />but agreed that a gate was appropriate in this case. <br />Is the emergency access acceptable for this development? <br />Commissioner Olson would accept the Fire Department's opinion on the emergency <br />access for the development. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed with Commissioner Olson's comments. <br />Grading <br />Is the amount of stepped and flat buildingpads acceptable? <br />Commissioner O'Connor expressed concern about grading and moving a lot of dirt as <br />well as having too many stepped homes. He was not as concerned about marketability <br />but was concerned about massing and the need for screening by landscaping. He would <br />not want to increase the number of stepped lots. <br />Commissioner Olson found the amount of stepped and flat pads acceptable. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she would like more information and believed there <br />should be more emphasis on the houses fitting the land rather than the other way around. <br />She noted that she would like to see more detail. <br />Does the Commission support Lots 1-S, 7, 11, 12, 17-19, and the private park being <br />partially located in areas with slopes exceeding 25 percent? <br />Commissioner O'Connor did not know how much the private park would be graded <br />down and agreed that it should be flat to accommodate the children. With the gate, he <br />believed it would be fairly private and that some minimal grading would be necessary; he <br />would like to see a more natural look to the area. He added that a play area should be <br />added for the children. He supported filling in some low areas along the ridgeline in <br />order to create a buffer from the other housing developments. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2008 Page 23 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.