Laserfiche WebLink
be beneficial to the neighboring homeowners, and he proposed that this be a gated <br />community; he believed that would be a prudent decision. He noted that they designed <br />the project to stay away from the ravines, trees, and ridges. He noted that they created <br />larger lots to add to the open feeling. <br />Jeff Holmwood, RJA Associates, project planner/engineer, responded to Commissioner <br />Olson's question about the minimum lot size and stated that the minimum lot size would <br />be 15,000 square feet. He noted that with respect to grading, they did not plan to remove <br />very many trees and that one or two trees may be lost in putting the bridge across the <br />creek. He noted that they had not surveyed the location of those trees at this time. They <br />envisioned that Lots 14 through 18 along the west side would be split lots with short <br />pads. With respect to the existing slope exceeding 25 percent, he noted that those lots <br />had small slivers that exceeded 25 percent and that no lot completely covered a <br />25 percent slope. With respect to circulation, Dublin Canyon Road would be improved at <br />the project entrance to include right-turn-in/right-turn-out lanes and that a westbound <br />left-turn lane would go into the project. He noted that a traffic signal would probably be <br />required at the project entrance or at the Canyon Meadows development entrance, <br />depending on the results of the traffic report. He estimated that it would be at the Canyon <br />Meadows development entrance because there were more units to be served than at their <br />project. <br />In terms of visual impact, Mr. Holmwood stated that they planned to design the project so <br />that no homes would be visible from the residents along Dublin Canyon Road. He noted <br />that none of the homes would be visible from the Canyon Meadows development, but the <br />proposed homes on Lots 5, 6 and 7 may be visible from the homes in the Canyon Creek <br />neighborhood. They planned to either lower the building pads in that location or build <br />one-story homes. He noted that an extensive photomontage would be created for that and <br />other locations for the EIR process. He noted that they did not wish to build sound walls, <br />and would mitigate the noise without doing so. He estimated that the home sizes would <br />be 2,500 square feet and up; they proposed using a 40 percent FAR for the smaller lots, <br />and a 30 percent FAR for the 20,000-square-foot lots. <br />Rodger Rager noted that he lived in the Canyon Creek Circle neighborhood and did not <br />have a problem with the development itself. He was concerned about the ensuing traffic <br />and was not sure a signal light would be the answer; he supported a traffic study. He <br />noted that the nearby MTO Church had proposed approximately 200 vehicles. He added <br />that a nearby development at the City limit sign would also bring a lot of cars to Dublin <br />Canyon Road. He believed that when Safeway moves its headquarters into the old <br />Farmers Insurance building, traffic would also increase. He added that all of his <br />neighbors shared his concern about the traffic. <br />Mr. Taeb noted that they were also concerned about the traffic. He believed that the <br />traffic from the Safeway office would go towards Foothill Road and I-580, whereas the <br />project traffic would go in the opposite direction. He noted that the residents of Canyon <br />Creek Meadows did have difficulty leaving their development when cut-through traffic <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2008 Page 19 of 26 <br />