My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022708
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 022708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:36:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 022708
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum suggested changing the language from "400 feet" to <br />"bringing it to an existing waterline on the Brosozky property." <br />Ms. Decker suggested that the Commission consider that the timing be tied to the <br />anticipated construction. The applicant would go through the final map recordation, bond <br />the project, and submit the improvement plans for Road A. Before the grading permit <br />could be issued, the City would provide estimates 60 days prior to the grading permit. <br />Before the grading permit on-site could be issued, the issue of the estimates and deposits <br />would have been resolved to reflect current costs for on-site work. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Narum regarding the trigger to have the <br />money paid and cleared if the work cost more than anticipated, Ms. Decker replied that <br />there were generally contingency costs and "not-to-exceed" limits which the contractor <br />would be responsible for meeting. Any change orders would be handled between the <br />parties, and a reputable contractor would not exceed the estimated costs without <br />agreement by the builder. She noted that the waterline was generally an uncomplicated <br />structure. She did not anticipate that a reputable contractor would substantially exceed <br />the bid. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioners Fox and O'Connor. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. <br />Resolution No. PC-2008-10 recommending approval of PUD-05-02M was entered <br />and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Olson advised that he would recuse himself from Item 6.b. due to a <br />conflict of interest. <br />Commissioner Fox left the meeting at this time. <br />A recess was called at 9:18 p.m. <br />Acting Chair Pearce reconvened the meeting at 9:26 p.m. <br />b. PUD-71, Michael Aminian/Medeiros Gardens, LLC <br />Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan to replace <br />the approved production home designs with design guidelines for the property <br />located at 1944 Vineyard Avenue, in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan <br />Area. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development -Low <br />Density Residential) District. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2008 Page 15 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.