My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022708
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 022708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:36:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 11:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 022708
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Pearce would like to tie it to the final map and for the timeline to be more <br />than 60 days. <br />Commissioner Fox suggested that atwo-year timeline be used. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the timeline was 10 years from the date of recording and <br />will expire in November 2012. <br />Acting Chair Pearce suggested that one year from final map recordation be used, which <br />was not as unduly burdensome as 60 days. She preferred the City to be an intermediary <br />and that the contact between the two parties be limited in terms of Condition No. 23. <br />Commissioner Fox suggested adding a condition that Mr. Brozosky had the right to <br />review and have the right of refusal to have work done on his property. She did not <br />believe the onus should be on him to get the bids. <br />Acting Chair Pearce noted that the Chrismans would get the bids. She wanted each party <br />to have an opportunity to be involved in this process. <br />Ms. Decker noted that while Condition No. 23 stated that the Brozoskys shall submit <br />three bids, the City could be the facilitator of the process and coordinate the acquisition <br />of three bids from professional firms as recognized by the City as being sound <br />contractors. There would be feedback from all parties at that time. <br />In response to an inquiry by Acting Chair Pearce regarding whether the amendment was <br />acceptable to the maker and seconder of the motion, Commissioner Fox and <br />Commissioner Olson agreed that it was. <br />Commissioner Narum suggested reopening the public hearing to allow the parties to <br />comment on the amendment. <br />Commissioner Narum moved to re-open the public hearing to allow Mr. Brozosky <br />and Mr. Schlies to comment on the motion on the floor with regard to Condition <br />No. 23. <br />Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Fox, Narum, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. <br />The motion passed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2008 Page 13 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.