PC 010908 - Laserfiche WebLink

THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Chair Blank requested staff and legal counsel to look at some of the comments. He noted that the Minutes would not be considered for approval this evening. Ms. Decker requested the Commission to consider the approval of the Minutes. She noted that the question about page 2 referred to the October 24, 2007 Minutes, and staff can listen to the tapes of that meeting, determine what was intended, and clear up the issue. Chair Blank noted that the Commission had received advice from the previous legal counsel regarding including conditions on non-applicants. He requested staff to review Condition No. 28. Ms. Decker clarified that it was not the intent of Condition No. 28 to condition the Roberts. She noted that the language was clear to staff and the Commission at the time this matter came before the Commission. She reiterated that it was not intended that the Roberts were to be forestalled from the irrigation of their grapes. She indicated that staff would look at the language and clarify the intent of the condition before the items goes before the City Council; staff would then advise the Commission of any changes that are made. Ms. Harryman stated that she was able to figure out what the sentence on page 2 was referencing. She noted that Commissioner Fox had pointed out in the previous paragraph that the discussion on the types of prof ect for design review was not included in the October 24tH Minutes, and Commissioner Narum was simply pointing out where in the Minutes that discussion could be found. Commissioner Narum moved to approve the Minutes for November 14, 2007 as amended. Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. The motion passed, and the Minutes of November 14, 2007 were approved as amended. a. December 12, 2007 Commissioner Fox distributed copies of revisions she had made to the section on the PAUP-4, Jennifer Hosterman, item and requested that the consideration of these Minutes be continued. She noted that it had been a while since this hearing was held; she listened to the audio and added some missing sections, particularly on the classification of whether or not the hawk is a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 9, 2008 Page 3 of 28