Laserfiche WebLink
Initiative is "Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap Initiative", if the word, "citizens' is put in it, <br />could it be litigious. City Attorney Roush said he could not guarantee that if the word, "citizens" <br />is put in, someone couldn't challenge it, but he does not think that the ballot question is the <br />determining factor. What will be in the materials in terms of what voters are voting on will be the <br />title, and putting in the word, "citizens' would not subject the ballot statement into a successful <br />Writ of Mandate. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne said he came to the meeting ready to support Option 4, depending on what <br />he heard from the public. If it were him writing the ballot language, he would do this because it is <br />much more descriptive. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio thinks giving voters clear information is important and this does not <br />necessarily do that, and preferred more description. Councilmember Sullivan thinks it is <br />important to keep the question clean and direct. <br />Motion: It was m/s by Sullivan/McGovern to approve Option 1, as amended, to include the word <br />"citizens"'. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne <br />Noes: Councilmember Cook-Kallio, Mayor Hosterman <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Motion: It was m/s by McGovern/Sullivan to require an impartial analysis be prepared by the <br />City Attorney. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Councilmember Sullivan questioned whether or not a motion was needed on the authors of the <br />ballot argument, and City Attorney Roush said this is needed only if the Council was interested <br />in being the writer of the argument. If not, that portion of the resolution would be deleted and <br />transfer to the petitioners in favor to write the argument; however, if there is interest on the <br />Council to write the argument against the initiative and/or rebuttal, it would be appropriate to <br />take that action at this time. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she would like to be involved in writing the argument against <br />and could also designate additional signers of no more than two Councilmembers to sign on <br />with her. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned if she wanted to do a rebuttal to something the Council <br />may put forward later, she hoped the Council would support this issue. Councilmember Sullivan <br />agreed, stating he does not believe the Council should be writing oppositions to citizen's <br />initiatives. <br />Motion: It was m/s by Hosterman/Cook-Kallio that Councilmember Cook-Kallio take the lead in <br />writing the rebuttal to the Citizen's Initiative. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />City Council Minutes 7 July 15, 2008 <br />