My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 85450
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RES 85450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 8:18:44 AM
Creation date
12/28/1999 8:02:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/17/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 85-450 <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPEAL OF GENE FINCH TO A <br /> DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALLOW A VARIANCE <br /> FROM THE ORDINANCE CODE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM <br /> BUILDABLE FLOOR AREA ALLOWED FOR PROPERTY AT 649 MAIN <br /> STREET <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 28, 1985, the Board of <br /> Adjustment denied case V-85-25, which denied a variance <br /> from the Ordinance Code to increase the maximum <br /> buildable floor area allowed for property participating <br /> in a parking assessment district to facilitate <br /> construction of an addition to an existing commercial <br /> structure at 649 Main Street; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Ordinance Code of the <br /> City of Pleasanton, the applicant submitted an appeal to <br /> the City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of September 17, 1985, the City Council <br /> reviewed a report (SR 85:456) from the Director of <br /> Planning and Community Development together with copies <br /> of staff reports to the Board of Adjustment regarding <br /> this matter; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at which time <br /> applicant and any other member of the public was offered <br /> an opportunity to present evidence regarding this <br /> appeal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, after a review of the material presented, the City <br /> Council makes the following findings: <br /> <br /> a. That because of special circumstances applicable to <br /> the property, including size, shape, topography, <br /> location or surroundings, the strict application of <br /> the provision of this chapter would deprive the <br /> subject property of privileges enjoyed by other <br /> properties in the vicinity and under identical <br /> zoning classification; <br /> <br /> b. That the granting of the variance will not <br /> constitute a grant of special privilege <br /> inconsistent with the limitation on other <br /> properties classified in the same zoning district; <br /> <br /> c. That the granting of the variance will not be <br /> detrimental to the public health,safety or welfare, <br /> or materially injurious to properties or <br /> improvements in the vicinity; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.