My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091608
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CCMIN091608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2008 1:36:40 PM
Creation date
10/8/2008 1:36:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN091608
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
they held a public workshop and a grocery store was suggested for the site and TOD walkable <br />communities have come to the forefront. Fortunately the main headquarters of a grocer is within <br />walking distance, and those working for Safeway will take BART and go to work. They have <br />received a letter of intent from Safeway to occupy the 14,400 square foot space, and if the <br />zoning change is approved, they will be able to occupy the space. It will also be a service store <br />which includes a deli, possibly dry cleaning service, and a lot of services expected from a full <br />service grocer. <br />He noted their site is designed for an urban sized family, they originally split the affordability <br />factor 50% between low and very low units through the Housing Commission, and when they <br />looked at their financing situation it is very difficult to get a loan. They looked at tax credits and <br />bond financing and returned to the Housing Commission and proposed 20% of the units at 50% <br />of AMI at very low income which was agreed to. Part of that agreement is to provide 3 or 4 <br />specialized units for the disabled. He said they know they can get financing for 20% of the units <br />at 50% of AMI, but to add to the affordability of another 5% of the units at a moderate income <br />level, recognizing that moderate rents are typically above market, would be difficult to document <br />cash flow. <br />Mayor Hosterman asked if they are able to consider adding 5% moderate housing and work <br />through whether or not this can be penciled out. Mr. Heffner said their goal is to receive <br />approval so they can move on and if this needs to be done, they will provide it. She questioned <br />if the existing affordability can be included in perpetuity or beyond the ground lease, and Mr. <br />Heffner said they can do this, as the project will continue to be a rental project. <br />Steve Brozosky said the project is not truly a TOD without the grocery component and he asked <br />to make sure it is included in order for people not to drive. He voiced concern with the amount <br />of parking, believes the project has become a demonstration project for TOD housing, and if <br />allowed to go through, the City can learn from it. He felt it was important to get the 20% low <br />income, said the school district does not receive the higher funds and he would like to determine <br />the number of students the project will generate. <br />Christine Steiner, Citizens For a Caring Community, supported very low affordable housing <br />along with the extra 5%, said while money may be hard to get, bids are coming in low for some <br />of these projects, voiced the need for mall employees and suggested giving preference to <br />people in the project to work in the vicinity, suggested a pedestrian overpass to link projects to <br />the other side to the mall and supported the project. <br />The Mayor closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor Hosterman supported the project, said the parking numbers are not perfect, but felt the <br />applicant maximized parking opportunities. She was not concerned with the flyover as she <br />believed this would be a future project, and wanted the project to move forward. She supported <br />Ms. Steiner's suggestion of adding a pedestrian overpass if possible which would add to safety <br />and people walking and not driving. <br />Mr. Dolan said Condition 28 addresses the requirement for the applicant to provide a traffic <br />crossing, traffic controls, advanced signing, pavement markings and flashings, but it does not <br />envision a structure above the flow of traffic and he was not sure this would be recommended, <br />as the need to enliven the street is needed. <br />Councilmember McGovern said when this project came forward to her, she was willing to go <br />with 300 units due to the housing cap and the 5% moderate affordability is important to her, she <br />Council Meeting Minutes 5 September 16, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.