My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061008SP
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CCMIN061008SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2008 11:33:31 AM
Creation date
10/8/2008 11:30:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN061008SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Arroyo Mocho, picnic areas, open turf and open space areas. The reaction from the workshop <br />was positive, but most discussion focused on the proposal to include an ice facility on the site. <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission supported the ice rink facility, a second restroom and <br />suggested the addition of two water-related elements in the park, and additional study will take <br />place to determine what amenities could be placed in the detention basin. He introduced Jeff <br />Ferber, RRM Design, stating the firm completed the original community park master plan for <br />Bernal Community Park. <br />Jeff Ferber, RRM Design, provided a PowerPoint presentation. He stated the first two <br />workshops garnered input and direction from the community about the feel and look of the park, <br />and participants came up with 35-36 vision statements which lay the park's foundation. They <br />prioritized statements, broke into groups, and created a list of 100 different elements or facilities <br />for the park. He said the project does not propose to change the understanding that Stoneridge <br />Drive does not go through; he presented where it goes into the CLC facility with a cul-de-sac <br />feature which begins at the emergency vehicle access. In order to keep the park as pedestrian- <br />friendly as possible, Mr. Ferber said the EVA would be used to come down and enter into the <br />parking lot so that there is complete pedestrian space without any vehicle connections across <br />from the entry of the retail center to the parking lot. He concluded his presentation by showing <br />the various perspectives of the commercial retail center, Auto Mall and Stoneridge. <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to the Master Plan and road between Auto Mall Parkway and <br />the ice facility, and confirmed how cars would get to the ice facility. Mr. Ferber noted there is a <br />pedestrian pathway that goes all around the improvements, and in addition to the promenade, <br />there is a walkway that goes around the edge of the park. <br />Mayor Hosterman questioned how pedestrians would access the park and Mr. Wolfe said he <br />would describe how the connection gets made from the western part of Pleasanton to the park. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked for a map of all of the pathways and how they connect <br />between the two parks. Mr. Ferber said he did not have a separate exhibit but said there is the <br />ability for someone to walk both sites. <br />Mr. Wolfe said the plan calls for amenities that exceed what was originally intended. If the <br />Council supports lighted tennis courts or more than one court, or other amenities, it may be <br />necessary for staff to go back and look at additional funding sources for those because this was <br />not part of the original discussion with the developers. <br />He said the Council has the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation which is in <br />support of the plan shown. The Commission asked for an additional restroom and water play <br />feature. They also recommended that the potential operator of the ice facility, if approved, be <br />responsible to fund park improvements and that the park improvements be done concurrent with <br />the ice facility. Staff agrees with the Commission's recommendation with the exception of a <br />second restroom because the restroom in the proposed location would be isolated and there is <br />potential for vandalism. Staff has provided three other alternatives: 1) to not approve the Master <br />Plan at this time and it could be reviewed at a later date; 2) to pursue additional options if the <br />Council were interested in an ice facility at another location; and 3) to approve the Master Plan <br />without an ice facility. If option 3 were pursued, staff's recommendation would be to work with <br />the Commission and open it up for discussion again, as there are amenities the community may <br />wish to have considered in the acreage that did not come out in the master plan process. <br />Assistant City Manager Bocian said if the Council approves staff's recommendation, next steps <br />would be to work with the San Jose Arena Management on a ground lease and operations and <br />contributions they might make to the parks and begin work on their PUD. Staff will also work <br />Special Meeting Minutes 2 June 10, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.