My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 85364
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RES 85364
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2012 2:08:36 PM
Creation date
12/28/1999 12:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Deputy County Counsel <br /> <br /> LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 85-12 <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a resolution for application for Annexation No. ll3 to <br /> the City of Pleasanton was heretofore filed with the Executive Officer of the <br /> Local Agency Formation Commission; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said Executive Officer has reviewed said application and <br /> prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon, noting that a <br /> Negative Declaration has been prepared, and said application and Negative <br /> Declaration have been considered by this Commission; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, at the hearing on July 18, 198~, the Local Agency <br /> Formation Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, <br /> objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons <br /> present were given an opportunity to appear and be heard in respect to any <br /> matter relating to said application and report; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this annexation is uninhabited and not within an <br /> agricultural preserve, is within the Sphere of Influence of the City of <br /> Pleasanton, would reduce the size of an existing "island" within the City and <br /> results in no irregular tax splits; the owners have agreed to the annexation; <br /> and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Commission did find as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. The proposed annexation is consistent with the procedures and <br /> policies previously adopted by the Commission; <br /> <br /> 2. The annexation will permit the provision of municipal services <br /> by the City of Pleasanton to the subject area; and <br /> <br /> 3. The Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Pleasanton has <br /> been reviewed and approved. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT: <br /> <br /> Annexation No. 113 (Tawny-Bernal) to the City of Pleasanton be approved <br /> subject to the following terms: <br /> <br /> l. Correction of the map and description as may be required by the <br /> Director of Public Works, ex officio County Surveyor; and <br /> <br /> 2. The City be authorized to proceed without notice or hearing, <br /> <br /> | C~-'.-:':.~: T~: \T ll~E FC)REGO)NG )S A <br /> Cc'. . ~Y OF A RESOLUTION A- <br /> DC;..:,3. ,.".'-," 'i'H_~ I OCAL AGE,"4CY FOR- <br /> MAT'O'.~ ' "'."S-~:ON O,-': ALA/AEDA <br /> CO,.!? !TY, C.',:. ;",: ~IA ~ '7/]-8/85 <br /> AT'rEST ~ /~"" <br /> BMyE..L H -- <br /> <br />~.32ZLo <br /> ~;;'z "~;;~ ;~ ! ~! - , ~ . ~ . .. ..........!. ~ ....... : ........: ......:: ~ ,~-;z ~-:.-2,-, -', · -=..-~- .... <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.