PC 102407 - Laserfiche WebLink

noted that the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, Metropolitan Area Express (MAX), County Connection, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA), and Tri-Delta Transit all converged at the BART station and distributed people throughout North Pleasanton. Mr. Paxson noted that Policy 9-2 contained several areas that recommended further support with respect to regional planning. He noted that he was a member of the Alameda County Traffic Improvement Authority (ACTIA) Citizens' Watchdog Committee, funded by Measure B sales tax dollars. He noted that the committee did a lot of good work, which he believed was important to continue to support. He suggested broadening Policy 9 to make reference to ACTIA, the Congestion Management Agency (CMA), and the Tri-Valley Transportation Committee, which had been historically supported by the City. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether this presentation would be given to the City Council, Mr. Paxson replied that he would be happy to do so if needed. Given the lateness of the hour, Chairperson Fox inquired how the Commission intended to address this document. Commissioner Blank suggested that the Commission go through the redlined Draft Plan page by page and that the comments should be succinct rather than philosophical. The Commissioners concurred with that suggestion. In response to Commissioner Narum's inquiry about Division Street, Mr. Tassano confirmed that it would be a collector road, not arterial, as erroneously shown on the map. He noted that it was more appropriately denoted as a collector road. The Commission reviewed the Draft Circulation Element text and made the following recommendations on the redlined version: Text Pine 3-I No changes. PUQC 3-2 No changes. Paee 3-3 No changes. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 24, 2007 Page 27 of 40