My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 85363
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RES 85363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2012 2:08:11 PM
Creation date
12/28/1999 12:13:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ape/no d as to..Form: / <br /> ZGladys Houst~eputy County Counsel <br /> <br /> LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 85-11 <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a resolution for application for Annexation No. ll2 to <br /> the City of Pleasanton was heretofore filed with the Executive Officer of the <br /> Local Agency Formation Commission; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said Executive Officer has reviewed said application and <br /> prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon, noting that a <br /> Negative Declaration has been prepared, and said application and Negative <br /> Declaration have been considered by this Commission; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, at the hearing on july 18, 1985, the Local Agency <br /> Formation Commission heard and received all oral andswritten protests, <br /> objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons <br /> present were given an opportunity ~o appear and be heard in respect to any <br /> matter relating to said application and report; and <br /> <br /> WHREAS, this annexation is uninhabited and not within an <br /> agricultural preserve, is within the Sphere of Influence of the City of <br /> Pleasanton, would reduce the size of an existing "island" within the City and <br /> results in no irregular tax splits, and the owners have agreed to the <br /> annexation; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Commission did find as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. The proposed annexation is consistent with procedures <br /> previously adopted by the Commission; <br /> <br /> 2. The annexation will permit the provision of municipal services <br /> to the City of Pleasanton to the subject area; and <br /> <br /> 3. The Negative Declaration prepared by the City has been <br /> reviewed and approved. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT: <br /> <br />Annexation No. ll2 (Mission Hill) to the City of Pleasanton be approved <br />subject to the following terms: <br /> <br /> 1. Correction of the map and description as may be required by <br /> the Director of Public Works, ex officio County Surveyor;.and <br /> <br /> 2. The City be authorized to proceed without notice or hearing. <br /> <br /> | CERT~ THAT THE ~OREGOING ~S A <br /> CORRECT COPY OF A R~SOLUT~O~ A <br /> DOPI'ED BY TH~ lOCAl A~?,r .... ~ <br /> MAT;O): CC~F,;'.VS'S O: ~ O~ ,,' ~ ..... <br /> COL!~TY, C,\L:FC~ZZA _ez~ 7/18/85 <br /> <br /> / Ar-CO AUG 6 gg5 <br /> <br />4320c <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.