Laserfiche WebLink
existing City storm system. In addition, staff has included a recommendation that subdrains be installed <br />at the base of every cut slope. Another concern raised was erosion on the creek bank. A <br />biological/hydologic report indicated that the amount of storm water run-off entering the creek would be <br />slightly reduced once the project's proposed grading and drainage were completed. In addition, the slope <br />banks would be revegetated to dissipate the velocity of the water entering the creek, thus preventing <br />future erosion of the channel and improving the biological quality of the area. <br />Ms. Kline then gave a digital presentation illustrating the various house designs. The flat-pad design <br />proposed by the developer for single-story homes creates flat pads through the grading of slope banks <br />and the installation of retaining walls. In contrast, the split-pad design, which consists of one story on <br />one part of the house and two or more stories on another, utilizes a contour grading which maintains the <br />natural topography of the site. The step-foundation design is similar to the split-pad design and also <br />retains the existing topography of the land. <br />Ms. Kline also discussed the drainage system. She stated that the City's standazd for relatively flat lots is <br />to grade the lots so that they drain towards the street at a minimum one-percent slope. The water then <br />enters the catch basins and drain inlets in the street and flows into the City's stormwater collection <br />system. For slope lots, however, the method proposed is to allow the lots to drain to the rear through a <br />drain inlet or open concrete V-ditch and into underground pipes to the City system. <br />Ms. Kline then proceeded to explain the Neighbors' Plan developed by the Ventana Hills neighborhood <br />which includes 42 lots with 41 new lots and one existing lot. The lotting configuration is similaz to the <br />Developer's Plan and the "Historical" Plan except at the north side of the site, where it proposes a 200- to <br />300-foot wide buffer zone with trees between the north tier of lots in the development and the homes on <br />the southernmost edge of Ventana Hills; maintenance of the same grading as the existing topography; <br />single-story homes set back 300 feet and with side elevations oriented towards Ventana Hills; and a <br />greenbelt open space between the cul-de-sacs of the slopebazik. In addition, this Plan proposes that the <br />road to the future Lund Ranch II project be shifted from the northern to the southern side of site and to <br />maintain the top of the ridgeline on the south side of the knoll. <br />Ms. Kline then described the "Historical" Plan developed by staff which basically adheres to the design <br />principles of the NSSP. It proposes contour grading and split-pad homes at the same elevation as the <br />Ventana Hills on the northern end of the site, with a 40-foot sideyazd setback. This eliminates the slope <br />banks and retaining walls proposed in the Developer's Plan. <br />Ms. Kline requested direction from the Commission regarding the FAR. She stated that the NSSP <br />establishes a 30 percent FAR, Ventana Hills and Mission Pazk have 40 percent, Greenbriaz was <br />approved with 35 percent with the exception of a few lots allowed to build at 37 percent, and New Cities <br />Development is proposing up to 40 percent. <br />Ms. Kline stated that the azchitecture for the buildings aze well-designed including a vaziety of <br />vernaculaz house styles. She noted that Plan 1 shows 23-foot high single-story homes with the option to <br />become two stories. She requested the Commission to provide direction on whether or not the styles <br />_ would be appropriate for the azea inasmuch as the NSSP calls for ablending-in with the natural rural <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 20 June 24, 1998 <br />