PC 04/29/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

lots, it would impact the quality of the City lots to some extent because they would no longer have the same frontage that was planned. Another consideration is that during the golf course planning process, the owners of the Core property said they would not be supportive of any of the Spotorno lots being shifted to the golf course properties because they were concerned that would affect the value of their homes. He suggested that if the Commission is inclined to pursue the idea of allowing the additional homes in the area, they do so with the understanding that there could be other issues to be resolved. Commissioner Barker stated that she would like to include language to limit the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and to require a certain percentage of single-story homes in the 22 lot area. Commissioner Kumaran noted for the record that he supports the 1 1/2 acre proposal with the understanding that there will be no additional homes. A motion was made by Commissioner Dove, seconded by Commissioner Wright, recommending that Trail #7 be eliminated; that 22 homes be allowed on the Spotorno flat land that would include the provision that the lots be larger at Alisal Street and alongside the church; they would preserve a five-acre open space; that the FAR would be 25% for two-story homes and 40% for one-story homes to encourage the single story homes with a minimum of at least 6 single story homes; to construct the bypass road now and that the City pay for it now if necessary and collect later from the Spotornos on the basis of acost-sharing formula that would give consideration to the fact that there are additional road trips other than just that coming from the Spotorno property; that the family compound would be approved with provisions that the Spotornos identify to staff before the City Council meeting where that site will be so that the City Council will know specifically what they are approving; and to allow, subject to negotiations with the Planning Department, the transfer of up to six units from the 75 MDR area down to the golf course area, and if that happens, then to reduce the number of allowable units in the MDR area to 69. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Barker, Dove, Wright, and Chair Cooper NOES: Commissioner Kumaran ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None The motion carried. Commissioner Kumaran noted for the record that he opposed the motion because of the conditions allowing the relocation of six homes form the MDR area and because of the road cost sharing proposition. Mr. Rasmussen requested clarification on the location of the family compound. He asked whether that was limited to just one home with agricultural buildings. The Commission agreed and also noted that the site should be in a screened location and identified for the City Council at the time of their review of the specific plan. Planning Commission Page 13 Apri129, 1998