PC 04/22/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Iri summary, Ms. Varela asked that the Commission consider her comments in making its decision. Douglas Krah responded to Ms. Varela's concems. He assured her that strict guidelines aze already in place to address noise issues. He also stated that there are hundreds more parking spaces included in this - project in comparison to similar projects. Finally, he candidly stated that from a builder's standpoint, it's very difficult to make money on single family homes, no matter how large or affordable and, therefore, single family homes are not being considered in the project. In response to a question by Commissioner Barker, Mr. Krah stated that he is generally happy and in agreement with the conditions of approval. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Kumaran asked Mr. Iserson to clazify the timing and sequence of the PUD and vesting of the tentative map. Mr. Iserson explained that if the PUD is approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the applicant would then have to get a new vested tentative map for this project. Until then, the existing tentative map for the original project would still be valid, and the applicant could proceed with the project under the original approval and conditions. Commissioner Bazker applauded the developer for coming forward with a new, better plan. She was specifically impressed with the larger buffer to Stoneridge Drive. In addition, she appreciates the community recreation centers included in the project, commenting that such amenities makes a closely knit neighborhood. She felt that Carole Vazela had some good points, and that City maintenance is not all that great. She had hoped for some affordable units and some single story homes. She further stated that although the developer will contribute to the Affordable Housing Fund, she wondered whether there was any hope for including any single-story and/or affordable elements in the project. She has a few concerns, such as schools, but likes the sepazated sidewalks. In conclusion, Commissioner Barker is in support of staff s recommendations and conditions of approval. Commissioner Wright reported that he very much likes the design and architecture as well as the staggering of the homes. He likes the long driveways, and feels that the separated sidewalks look nice, although maintenance of the planter strip can be inconsistent, but not in this case since the homeowners association will maintain it. In addition, he stated that he was surprised with the current market values of the units, but overall he is pleased with the project and is in support of the application. Commissioner Dove feels that the developer has done a very good job in designing this project. He stated that the design of the yards have made it possible to have lazger homes that are closer together, while still providing privacy to the neighbors. He likes the ambiance of the sepazated sidewalks. He feels this new housing type will be a good trial for future development within the City. He also commented that although he would like to see the developer include some single-story homes in the project, he understands their position and that they are available elsewhere. He also feels that compared to the rest of the current market, these units are affordable, and he supported the application. Commissioner Kumaran noted for the record that he visited the property and feels it's a beautiful site. However, he has some reservations regarding the density and the increased traffic to existing traffic problems on Stoneridge Drive. He feels that the density and the area is being used to its limit, which made him very seriously and strongly question whether he could support the PUD finding that the Planning Commission Page 8 April 22, 1998