PC 04/22/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Iserson explained that while this property is within and governed by the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan, it is also being considered to be part of the proposed east side specific plan. He stated that the previously approved project already has a vested tentative map and, therefore, if this modified application is not approved, the applicant can proceed with the originally approved project. However, the applicant and staff agree that this proposed modification is superior to the original plan. Mr. Iserson also stated that the project is in compliance with the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan and the Pleasanton General Plan. Staff feels that the project would not create any problems as to which road alignment could be chosen for Stoneridge Drive under the Specific Plan. Staff has included a condition that approval of this project will not preclude putting Stoneridge Drive in its alternate location south of the Arroyo. In addition, staff feels that this project is far enough away from the Busch and Staples Ranch properties that it would not impact planning for those sites. The landscaping plan was described, and Mr. Iserson noted that a soundwall would be constructed adjacent to the homes that back to Stoneridge Drive and at the recreation area. Mr. Iserson stated that the FAR on this project is somewhat high due to the smaller lots and larger public streets. The applicant has agreed to work with staff in an attempt to reduce the FAR, and a condition of approval has been included to address this issue. Mr. Iserson also provided a description of the azchitectural and screening features proposed for the development, as well as the sideyazd setbacks and their related conditions of approval. The recreation area and its proposed location was also described. Street access to the proposed development would be from Trevor Parkway and Dennis Drive, public streets approved under the previous PUD Development Plan and subdivision map and presently under construction with the Village Two Development. Public Notices were sent to all neighbors within 1,000 feet of the proposed development. Only one response was received, from Carole Vazela, who recommended that the streets be private instead of public. However, staff is not in support of this recommendation and suggests that they be maintained as public streets. In summary, staff feels that the proposed development is well designed and very attractive and would fit in nicely with the surrounding azea. Staff, therefore, recommends approval subject to the conditions in the staff report and in the April 22, 1998 memorandum. In response to a question by Commissioner Wright, Mr. Iserson stated that all three villages would have their own Homeowner's Association and recreation area. Commissioner Barker asked what the price range would be for the units, and Mr. Iserson stated it would be in the mid to upper $300,000 range. Commissioner Kumaran asked whether a study had been done on the circulation element, and Mr. Iserson advised him that it was done under the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan. A brief discussion took place regarding the study. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Planning Commission Page 6 April 22, 1998 _-. __ _._..-- --_____. _r _._--...-.