PC 03/25/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

hazazdous to health; however, he noted that there are other perspectives on this issue and that he advocates "prudent avoidance." On the whole, he supports the ordinance. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commissioner Kumaran reported that he has read the Telecommunications Act in its entirety while working in a strategy group at his currnt employer. He noted that the primary reason for it was for local companies to be able to provide long-distance service and long-distance companies to be allowed to enter the local market. He did not read anywhere in the Act where it precluded the City from being able, in some way, to insure the safety of its citizens' health and quality of life. He also commented that all of the information he has heard on the health impacts of EMF due to the placement of antennas is inconclusive. He agrees that there is a problem with aesthetics and property values. He further stated that he does not see how businesses are being restricted under the ordinance, nor does it hamper their ability to provide service. In addition, he feels that the 300-foot setback is a reasonable compromise. He suggested that all companies attempt to place antennas alongside buildings, etc. and hide or disguise them. Commissioner Kumaran recommended amending Section 18.110.250, Fees, to include the providers in the process; however, he wants to indicate that the City shall be the final decision-making authority. He also recommends amending Section 18.110.030, Revocation of Approval, to fully identify the procedure. Finally with regazd to Section 18.110.040(1), Submittals, he suggests that a summary of the lease agreement be accepted in lieu of a copy of the full agreement. In conclusion, he supports the ordinance with the modifications noted above. Commissioner Barker stated that she agrees with Commissioner Kumaran 100% on all points. She feels that the ordinance is not directed, in any way, toward health effects, but rather just to zoning. She felt that the ordinance is a good compromise and that the process was good. However, she suggested that the cemetery be considered in the 300-foot buffer zone. Otherwise, she supports the ordinance as submitted. Commissioner Wright commented that the perceived health risk is not substantiated. However, he agrees that there is a problem with aesthetics and property value impacts. He would like to see the antennas be less intrusive. He also supports the ordinance and agrees to the suggestions made by Commissioner Kumazan. However, he would like to modify Section 18.110.50, Locational Standards, to allow wireless facilities in agricultural azeas. He also feels they should be in and within 300 feet of private schools, childcare centers, senior caze facilities, and nursing homes. He also would like to make the changes with the due process language and lease information. Commissioner Wright noted that he also supports the ordinance. Commissioner Dove feels that the main issue is the appeazance. He understands that there has been a lot of compromise on both sides and, therefore, the ordinance should be adopted. He feels that the proposed ordinance needs to be fine tuned mainly to prevent future litigation. In summary, he supports the ordinance. Chair Cooper feels that the level of RF is regulated appropriately. He stated that he will not support an ordinance that in any way refers to health effects. He also noted that the 300-foot buffer relates to aesthetics and not health effects. In addition, he agrees that the City should monitor compliance of all antennas within FCC standards. Chair Cooper also commented that he does not understand the difference between a telephone line in a residential neighborhood and a wireless facility in terms of Planning Commission Page 15 March 25, 1998