My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 6-26-2008
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
100708
>
01 6-26-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2008 5:00:55 PM
Creation date
9/29/2008 4:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/7/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01 6-26-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager Fialho said both could be joined as an outcome by re-affirming the General Plan <br />policies and existing hillside regulations and creating a task force. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she did not want a task force and would rather look at a more <br />open process and would rather say, create an ordinance that identifies elevation levels and <br />ridgelines in the same way Measure F did, subject to CEQA. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne requested to include a public, collaborative process. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio agreed. <br />The Vice Mayor Thorne also wanted to define ridgelines, identify what those are, and that the <br />process evaluates whether or not we can define ridgelines other than a 25% slope. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she would prefer not to include this but she would ask staff to <br />create ballot language. She suggested keeping the ballot language simple and asked staff to <br />start going about the process of identifying ridgelines and elevation levels. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne said as long as the Council gets to that point, he was supportive of this. <br />Councilmember Sullivan said initially it was stated the Council has in its work plan to create <br />some sort of hillside ordinance, but Councilmember Cook-Kallio's proposal is for item 2 which is <br />re-affirming the existing General Plan policies. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she wants to add additional language to this to say that the <br />Council will re-affirm the 1996 General Plan and include the commitment that the Council would <br />bring forth an ordinance that would be subject to environmental review (CEQA), identifying <br />elevation levels and major ridgelines and to include a provision to trump the other initiative.." <br />She also would ask that we start before the November election so people could see what that <br />process looks like and begin to have input. She said the bottom line is not us against them, but <br />providing a hillside ordinance that does not leave the City open to litigation and actually protects <br />the hillsides. <br />Vice-Mayor Thorne accepted the amendment <br />City Attorney Roush stated that if Option 2 goes to the ballot along with the commitment <br />language and it got more votes than the other Initiative, and if the out come of the task force or <br />collaborative public process came up with items that were different than the 1996 General Plan <br />policies, then this would have to go back to the voters. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio referred to Section 5.1 of the General Plan; "Develop a ridgeline <br />preservation ordinance and scenic hillside design guidelines to improve safety and reduce the <br />potential negative visual impacts of development in hilly areas." <br />City Attorney Roush said this can be done, but that policy is more of a procedural matter than a <br />substantive matter, and he wants to be sure staff brings back what the Council is looking for. <br />She said the intent is to have everyone participate in the process and said those decisions can <br />be made before the November election if everyone chooses to do so. <br />Special Meeting Minutes 13 June 26, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.