Laserfiche WebLink
yJ <br />THE CITY OF <br />- -• -- ~" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br />j~L~~S~4NTONe <br />September 16, 2008 <br />City Manager <br />TITLE: RESOLUTION OPPOSING STATE BUDGET DECISIONS TO USE <br />LOCAL GOVERNMENT, REDEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION <br />FUNDS TO FINANCE STATE OPERATIONS. <br />SUMMARY <br />Approval of the California State budget remains at an impasse. On July 1, 2008, the <br />State Legislature missed its Constitutional budget deadline. With an estimated $15.2 <br />billion deficit, local governments, transportation and redevelopment programs are at risk <br />from losing critical revenues and may be the solution to the State budget. The <br />Legislature and Governor remain divided on a budget solution. Local government <br />organizations such as the League of California Cities have urged legislators to balance <br />the state budget with state funds and not local government, redevelopment or <br />transportation funds. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Adopt a resolution opposing State budget considerations to use local government <br />redevelopment and transportation revenues to finance state operations. <br />FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br />Beginning in 2009, Proposition 1A (2004) will allow the State to borrow up to 8% of local <br />government property tax revenue. This can occur if the Governor declares a fiscal <br />hardship and requires atwo-thirds vote of the legislature. The loan has a maximum of <br />three years, must be paid back with interest and may only be approved twice in a ten- <br />year period. In Pleasanton, the State's ability to borrow local revenues could result in a <br />loss of at least $3,140,000 for property tax revenue alone. <br />