Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 08-233 <br />Attachment <br />AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA AND <br />THE CITY OF PLEASANTON REGARDING TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TAX <br />REVENUES IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 152 MARTIN <br />AVENUE BUFFER ZONE <br />This Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code <br />Section 99 and shall constitute the agreement for exchange of property tax revenues <br />required by the Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b)(6). Furthermore, Revenue and <br />Taxation Code Section 99(b)(5) provides that if a jurisdictional change will alter the <br />service azea or service responsibility of a special district, the Boazd of Supervisors of the <br />county in which the special district is located shall negotiate any exchange of property tax <br />revenues on behalf of the special district. <br />The parties agree that for annexation of this parcel located on the east side of Martin <br />Avenue and north of Mohr Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A, pages 3-4, listing all <br />applicable parcel numbers, to this agreement and incorporated herein, the Auditor- <br />Controller of the County of Alameda is directed to cause an exchange of property tax <br />revenue as follows: <br />A. The City is entitled to receive an allocation of computed property tax revenue <br />equivalent to the shaze of property tax revenue it receives on a weighted <br />average citywide. The weighted citywide average shall be computed annually <br />as follows: multiply the City's current AB8 factor in each tax rate area within <br />the city by the current secured assessed valuation in each tax rate area to <br />arrive at a product for each tax rate area. The sum of those products is divided <br />by the total secured assessed valuation within the city to arrive at a weighted <br />citywide average. The secured tax roll is used here to establish the weighted <br />citywide average. However, the factors resulting from application of the <br />formula will apply to all tax rolls. <br />B. In the event that the City currently provides a service within its incorporated <br />city limits such as Fire or Library, and if that service is cunrently being <br />provided by a County taxing agency or special district in the territory <br />proposed for annexation, the County shall receive an allocation of computed <br />property tax revenue equivalent to the shaze of property tax revenue received <br />by the county taxing agency or special district in the territory proposed for <br />annexation. The County's receipt of that allocation shall not diminish the <br />City's receipt of its allocation calculated under A above. <br />C. In the event that the City assumes full responsibility for a service not currently <br />being provided by the city within its incorporated city limits, but being <br />provided by a separate County taxing agency or special district within the <br />territory proposed for annexation, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code <br />99(b), the City shall receive, in addition to the allocation determined in A <br />above, an allocation of computed property tax revenue equivalent to the share <br />08-233 At[achment.doc Page 1 <br />