Laserfiche WebLink
information to date which has been reviewed by the subcommittee, and it has become apparent <br />that changes will be necessary to existing services if the City intends to meet its target of a 75% <br />recycling goal. Staff maintains a material recovery facility on Bush Road, a green waste and <br />food scrap program, abuy-back center, an E-waste process, oil recycling, and not withstanding <br />this, the current rate is 53-55% and amendments need to be made to reach the 75% target. <br />The subcommittee has reviewed implementing a source separating single stream recycling <br />service, implementation of a commercial recycling program in phases, and look at addressing a <br />construction and demolition debris ordinance. <br />Regarding modifications to the residential recycling program, it provides every resident with an <br />additional recycling cart which would allow for 15% more recycling collection of multiple <br />sources, the cost and details of which must still be worked out. <br />Mr. Bocian said the subcommittee also discussed a commercial program in phases, said <br />businesses would be provided paper/cardboard carts and then working cooperatively with <br />Dublin to extract recyclables collectively. PGS has also agreed to implement a commercial <br />recycling program. When looking at rates, they can range from 12%-35% based on how <br />financial information is interpreted. Services can range from 10%-16% depending on the final <br />scope of the recycling service and how all of the numbers are reviewed. The subcommittee has <br />been concerned it will take some time to work its way through all details and numbers of the <br />complex programs and asked staff to review what it thought the base increase amount they <br />could support at this time on an interim level and staff arrived at 12% needed to meet service <br />demands for existing services through March of 2011. He then presented a breakdown of fees <br />comprising the 12% base increase, the survey conducted by StopWaste.Org, which shows <br />Pleasanton is doing well based on the 90-gallon can, as compared to other cities. <br />Staff provided three options; 1) to approve the interim rate increase, which is staff's <br />recommendation; 2) not approve the rate increase and direct the subcommittee and staff to <br />meet and bring back an alternate rate for existing services; 3) to not approve the adjustment at <br />this time and direct staff to bring back a rate for the modified services, which would take 6 <br />months to get resolved. <br />Mayor Hosterman said this is her sixth year in reviewing the rate structure and supported staff's <br />recommendation. <br />Mayor Hosterman noted there were no speakers. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne said he recycles now, confirmed this would continue to be possible, but did <br />not want to incur the cost of the cart. <br />Councilmember Sullivan said he serves on the Alameda County Waste Management Board, <br />has seen what other cities are doing and Pleasanton is dead last on its diversion rate in the <br />county. If the City needs to go beyond the 54% it will need to go to a source separated program <br />which is what most other cities have. He also agreed residents want to address recycling and <br />greenhouse gases, supported a commercial program, given the many office parks, cited the <br />good reputation of the consultant used, supported the initial proposal recommended by staff as <br />a starting point as well as future work. <br />Regular City Council/ <br />Library Board of Trustees Minutes 13 June 17, 2008 <br />