My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061708
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CCMIN061708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2008 4:00:10 PM
Creation date
8/21/2008 4:00:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN061708
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion: It was m/s by Sullivan/Thorne to approve Concurrent City Council /Library Board of <br />Trustees item and adopt Resolution No. 08-220 approving the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Mid-Term <br />Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Update. Motion passed by the following <br />vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />BREAK: Mayor Hosterman called for a short break, and thereafter reconvened the regular <br />meeting. <br />17. Save Pleasanton's Hills & Housing Cap Initiative Petition: <br />a. Continued -Receive report analyzing the impacts and effects of the Initiative and <br />consider implementation option <br />b. Consider options and provide direction concerning the Initiative Petition <br />City Attorney Roush said last month the City Council accepted the City Clerk's certification for <br />the Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap Initiative and directed staff to prepare a report <br />under Election Code Section 9212 concerning the effects of the Initiative Measure. This report <br />has been prepared and presented as Item 17a which has been continued. After the Council <br />receives and discusses the report, the Council would move ahead to take action to either adopt <br />the measure without change or order the election and direct staff to return with required <br />documents to place the Initiative Measure on the 2008 Ballot. This would include the time for <br />submitting arguments pro and con as well as the Ballot language itself. Alternatively, if the <br />Council is not comfortable in taking action tonight without having discussed the report, it could <br />also continue the item. <br />Mayor Hosterman questioned whether the Council could move forward with Item 17b without <br />hearing Item 17a. City Attorney Roush said the Council could move forward; the purpose of <br />hearing the report is to help inform the Council in terms of whether it wishes to simply adopt the <br />Initiative Measure or to have the matter on the Ballot for the election. The other matters <br />contained as part of Item 17a was an adjunct that came out of the Council's discussion on May <br />20'" where the Council asked that the matter be presented. <br />Councilmember Sullivan said he thought the Council had to take action on the item within 30 <br />days, and City Attorney Roush said the Elections Code indicates that upon receiving discussion <br />of the report, the Council needs to either adopt the measure without change within 10 days or <br />order an election. The ordering of the election does not have a timeframe attached to it and he <br />did not believe there would be any particular harm that would result if the item were continued, <br />other than the fact that the closer the City gets to the August 7`" deadline, the less time it has to <br />bring materials back to the Council for discussion and decision. <br />City Manager Fialho said if the Council calls for the election tonight, it will provide staff with <br />specific direction on July 15 to present the ballot question and also the schedule for arguments <br />pro and con. Purely from an administrative perspective, staff prefers to receive direction tonight <br />on Item 17b. Conversely, another meeting will need to be scheduled to hear the ballot <br />information unless both are heard concurrently at a future date before July 15, 2008. <br />Regular City Council/ <br />Library Board of Trustees Minutes 10 June 17, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.