Laserfiche WebLink
Motion: It was m/s by Sullivan/Thorne to approve Concurrent City Council /Library Board of <br />Trustees item and adopt Resolution No. 08-220 approving the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Mid-Term <br />Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Update. Motion passed by the following <br />vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />BREAK: Mayor Hosterman called for a short break, and thereafter reconvened the regular <br />meeting. <br />17. Save Pleasanton's Hills & Housing Cap Initiative Petition: <br />a. Continued -Receive report analyzing the impacts and effects of the Initiative and <br />consider implementation option <br />b. Consider options and provide direction concerning the Initiative Petition <br />City Attorney Roush said last month the City Council accepted the City Clerk's certification for <br />the Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap Initiative and directed staff to prepare a report <br />under Election Code Section 9212 concerning the effects of the Initiative Measure. This report <br />has been prepared and presented as Item 17a which has been continued. After the Council <br />receives and discusses the report, the Council would move ahead to take action to either adopt <br />the measure without change or order the election and direct staff to return with required <br />documents to place the Initiative Measure on the 2008 Ballot. This would include the time for <br />submitting arguments pro and con as well as the Ballot language itself. Alternatively, if the <br />Council is not comfortable in taking action tonight without having discussed the report, it could <br />also continue the item. <br />Mayor Hosterman questioned whether the Council could move forward with Item 17b without <br />hearing Item 17a. City Attorney Roush said the Council could move forward; the purpose of <br />hearing the report is to help inform the Council in terms of whether it wishes to simply adopt the <br />Initiative Measure or to have the matter on the Ballot for the election. The other matters <br />contained as part of Item 17a was an adjunct that came out of the Council's discussion on May <br />20'" where the Council asked that the matter be presented. <br />Councilmember Sullivan said he thought the Council had to take action on the item within 30 <br />days, and City Attorney Roush said the Elections Code indicates that upon receiving discussion <br />of the report, the Council needs to either adopt the measure without change within 10 days or <br />order an election. The ordering of the election does not have a timeframe attached to it and he <br />did not believe there would be any particular harm that would result if the item were continued, <br />other than the fact that the closer the City gets to the August 7`" deadline, the less time it has to <br />bring materials back to the Council for discussion and decision. <br />City Manager Fialho said if the Council calls for the election tonight, it will provide staff with <br />specific direction on July 15 to present the ballot question and also the schedule for arguments <br />pro and con. Purely from an administrative perspective, staff prefers to receive direction tonight <br />on Item 17b. Conversely, another meeting will need to be scheduled to hear the ballot <br />information unless both are heard concurrently at a future date before July 15, 2008. <br />Regular City Council/ <br />Library Board of Trustees Minutes 10 June 17, 2008 <br />