26 ATTACHMENTS (B) - Laserfiche WebLink

Acting Chair Pearce believed it was preferable to have more direct language in the resolutions that would direct the City to take a specific action, rather than language more suitable for a General Plan. Commissioner O'Connor understood that the legal language existed that it was within the City's purview to compel. Commissioner Fox moved to make the finding that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved Final Environmental Impact Report for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan and that no additional environmental review is needed; to make the finding as listed in Exhibit E that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved PUD development plan findings for PUD-O5; and to recommend approval of the proposed modification subject to Exhibit B, Draft Conditions of Approval, of the staff report, with the following modifications: 1. Delete Condition No. 16 as it duplicates Condition No. 17; 2. Modify Condition No. 19 to state that the maximum FAR allowed would be consistent with the original Centex approvals for all lots; 3. Modify Condition No. 23 to state that as part of the improvements for the project, the applicant shall relinquish easement rights to the well located on the Brozosky property when the connection to City water is made. Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Fox and O'Connor. NOES: Commissioners Narum, Olson, and Pearce. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. The motion failed. Commissioner Olson moved to make the finding that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved Final Environmental Impact Report for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan and that no additiona- environmental review is needed; to make the finding as listed in Exhibit E that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved PUD development plan findings for PUD-O5; and to recommend approval of the proposed modification to the City Council, subject to Exhibit B, Draft Conditions of Approval, of the staff report, with the following modifications: 1. Delete Condition No. 16 as it duplicates Condition No. 17; 2. Modify Condition No. 19 will to state that the maximum FAR allowed would be consistent with the original Centex approvals for all lots; EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2008 Page 9 of 13