Laserfiche WebLink
walls in the rear yard areas of Lots 6-10, this is not a typical condition that has been <br />imposed. It poses some difficulty in the separation of the payment and maintenance of <br />the landscaping. For example, if the plant materials are irrigated by the water supply of <br />the HOA, it could be difficult to fairly distribute those costs when any of Lots 6-10 are <br />sold. After a lot sale the new owner will need some time to develop plans and obtain a <br />building permit. If the water supply is severed immediately, there is no assurance that <br />there will be water service on the newly sold lot. Secondly, the walls will be screened <br />once the homes are there, and the new owners will likely wish to develop their own <br />landscaping plan thus removing materials that have been planted. <br />If the Planning Commission wishes to impose such a condition, staff recommends that <br />landscaping, i.e. trees and/or shrubs, be planted between the retaining walls to mitigate <br />visual impacts. The required landscaping shall be installed along with the other public <br />improvements and shall be completed prior to the first lot being sold. The landscaping <br />could be maintained by the developer until such time the new homes are constructed <br />and occupied. At that time, the homeowners would be responsible for such landscaping <br />in their rear yard. Staff has a condition of approval that could be included in Exhibit B: <br />Landscaping,e.g. trees and/or shrubs shall be installed between the retaining <br />walls on Lots 6-10 along with the other public improvement and shall be <br />completed prior to the sale of the first lot. Said landscaping shall be <br />maintained by the developer until such time the new homes are constructed <br />and occupied. <br />6. Grading and Haul Routes <br />The application in question does not change the lot configuration or grading as shown in <br />the approved PUD-05 development plan (Exhibit C). The development on each lot <br />would be required to conform to the PUD-05 and tentative map approval unless <br />otherwise modified by this application. <br />Public testimony was taken sharing concern that the number of truck trips could impact <br />the condition of Vineyard Avenue. Recently, the City has invested significantly in <br />median plantings and new porous asphalt. The question posed to staff was what <br />impacts there might be, if any, and what conditions would mitigate any damages from <br />the construction of this project. <br />Vesting Tentative Map 7399 included the following condition concerning the hours <br />allowed for hauling trucks: <br />"32. In addition to regulating the haul route to and from this project pursuant to <br />PUD Condition No. 106, the City Engineer shall regulate the hours of all <br />truck traffic so as to avoid conflicts with school traffic during peak school <br />drop-off and pick-up hours and shall preclude use of the school loop road <br />as a portion of the approved haul route." <br />Case No. PUD-OS-02M 12 Planning Commission <br />