26 ATTACHMENTS (B) - Laserfiche WebLink

home to provide elevation or perspective renderings as a part of the submittal requirements to the architectural review board as well as for submittal to the City (pg.5). An example of a recently approved home for the Berlogar development is shown below: _-~=ate-. ~> ~__ ...._. I :^~:zS - _ .. ~-.~gxc- .-.._ _.. A separate condition of approval has not been provided because the requirement exists in the design guidelines which would be adopted if approved by the City Council. However, a condition of approval could be added requiring the visual renderings. 4. The orioinal Centex Homes Aaaroval The Planning Commission also questioned why the approved plans could not be constructed. The plans are owned by Centex, not the applicant. Staff has discussed the project with a Centex representative who has indicated that the applicant would need to purchase the development designs from Centex before developing construction documents. Staff supports the proposed modification to a custom home development in that the recent approval for the same modification for the Berlogar development phase was approved, and the changes would enable more variety of home styles in the development, subject to the same design guidelines which would ensure a certain theme and level of quality to the designs. However, there are numerous examples citywide that reflect differing architecture in adjacent developments. The Planning Commission has an opportunity to evaluate what the optimum architectural development type ought to be for the second phase of development; to have it remain as approved, or to allow it to be revised to a custom home development that will utilize the same design guidelines as those approved with the previous PUD modification that the Berlogars used to change their project from production to custom homes. Case No. PUD-OS-02M 10 Planning Commission