My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 MINUTES SPECIAL 06-26-08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
081908
>
01 MINUTES SPECIAL 06-26-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 3:09:54 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 3:00:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/19/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01 MINUTES SPECIAL 6-26-08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and the only concern that has been raised in the report is the proposed assisted living facilities <br />on Staples Ranch at this time. <br />Councilmember Sullivan said the current direction given is to count 240 units toward the cap. <br />Assuming the project gets approved, he confirmed with City Manager Fialho that the last <br />proposal submitted to the City would cause staff to count an additional 396 units towards the <br />cap. <br />Councilmember McGovern said the City has also used a definition of a housing unit in the past <br />and in looking at the November 29, 2005 Joint City Council/Planning Commission minutes on <br />land use, it talks about the Department of Housing and Community Development and defining a <br />unit. She questioned whether or not assisted living affordable housing units are counted at the <br />below market rate as part of our regional housing needs. <br />Mr. Iserson said they can be counted and City Attorney Roush noted the City is likely to count <br />as many units as it can toward its regional housing needs. <br />Councilmember McGovern said even though they are counted towards the housing cap, they <br />are still of great value toward meeting the City's regional housing needs, especially if they are <br />moderate or low income units. <br />Mayor Hosterman opened public comment <br />Allen Roberts said the Council is interested in placing an Initiative on the ballot to compete with <br />the one signed by 5,000 voters. The Initiative would not have any substantive effect but would <br />be a plan to create a plan but would trump the voter-sponsored Initiative. He questioned if 18 <br />months was realistic and that time frame would give a large enough window for developers to <br />get their projects approved, which would allow something to be enacted to save the hillsides <br />after they have already been ruined. He felt citizens should have the chance to get a vote on the <br />citizen's Initiative without the interference of aCouncil-sponsored plan. He urged the Council to <br />either do a companion Initiative or Option 4, which is to do nothing. <br />Lance Smith, Greenbriar Homes, applauded the Council for their decision to not adopt the <br />Initiative but to place it before the voters. He asked the Council to follow staff recommendation 2 <br />of the report to place a measure on the ballot that reaffirms the ridgeline protections in the <br />General Plan and additionally, to establish a simple and clear hillside plan. He discussed <br />benefits Greenbriar Homes provided the City through various developments, discussed projects <br />that do not threaten hillsides or ridge tops and are threatened by the Initiative, discussed issues <br />of the Initiative and questioned what it would protect, noting its vague and confusing language <br />which he believed would result in litigation. <br />Julie Rasnick said if people want to protect the hillsides they will vote for the Initiative signed by <br />over 5,000 voters and anything else put on the ballot will risk the hillsides and ridgelines. <br />Carolyn Newton said in the 1996 General Plan, there are clear references for the need to <br />protect hillsides, said the citizen's Initiative has environmental protections through leaving land <br />in its natural state and inevitably developers will threaten to sue the City and try to convince the <br />Council to make interpretations that will allow development. She asked the Council not to delay <br />the process in writing another Initiative which will take time and during the delay, approvals will <br />be sought to bulldoze trees and hills and she asked not to let this happen. She asked for a <br />moratorium on hillside development until people can vote. <br />Special Meeting Minutes 9 June 26, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.