Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum shall have been repudiated by the applicable developer. or, except <br />as described in the Offering Memorandum, any litigation or proceedings shall be <br />pending or threatened questioning the proposed developments or seeking to <br />enjoin the development thereof, or the City shall have received notice from the <br />applicable developer that it will be unable to proceed with the development as <br />described in the Offering Memorandum; (vi) any Federal or California court, <br />authority or regulatory body shall take action materially and adversely affecting <br />the ability of a developer to proceed with the development as contemplated by <br />the Offering Memorandum; (vii) an event described in paragraph 8 hereof occurs <br />which in the opinion of the Underwriter requires a supplement or amendment to <br />the Offering Memorandum, and such supplement or amendment is not agreed to <br />by the City: and <br /> <br /> (E) At or prior to the Closing, the Underwriter shall have received each of <br />the following documents: <br /> <br /> (i) Opinions, in form and substance satisfactory to the City and <br /> the Underwriter, dated as of the Closing Date, of (a) Sturgis. Ness. <br /> Brunsell & Sperry A Professional Corporation, Bond Counsel, and (b) <br /> Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law Corporation, Special Tax <br /> Counsel, approving, without qualification (except such qualification as may <br /> be acceptable to the Underwriter), the validity of the Bonds and the <br /> exemption of the interest thereon from federal income taxation and state <br /> personal income taxation, as described in the Offering Memorandum; <br /> <br /> (ii) Letters of Bond Counsel and of Special Tax Counsel. <br /> respectively, dated the date of the Closing and addressed to the <br /> Underwriter, to the effect that the opinions referred to in the preceding <br /> subparagraph (i) may be relied upon by the Underwriter to the same <br /> extent as if such opinions were addressed to them: <br /> <br /> (iii) A supplementary opinion, dated the date of the Closing and <br /> addressed to the Underwriter, of Bond Counsel to the effect that (i) this <br /> Purchase Contract has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by. <br /> and. assuming due authorization. execution and delivery by the <br /> Underwriter. constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of the City <br /> enforceable in accordance with its terms. except as such enforceability <br /> may be limited by the application of equitable principles if equitable <br /> remedies are sought: (ii) the Bonds are not subject to the registration <br /> requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the <br /> Resolution is exempt from qualification under the T~'ust Indenture Act of <br /> 1939. as amended: and (iii) the Bonds conform as to form and tenor to the <br /> description thereof contained under the caption "The Bonds" in the <br /> Offering Memorandum, and the statements contained therein under the <br /> captions "The Bonds"; The Improvement Project": "Bondowner Risks"; <br /> "Legal Opinion"; and "Tax Exemption", insofar as such statements <br /> purport to summarize certain provisions of the 191 3 Act, the Bond Law. <br /> the Bonds, the Resolution, the Proceedings or applicable provisions of the <br /> United States Internal Revenue Code, present a fair and accurate <br /> summary of such provisions: and. in connection with Bond Counsel's <br /> <br /> -6- <br /> <br /> <br />