Laserfiche WebLink
submersible pump in the ground and a pressure tank and that water was pumped from the ground <br />into the tank. She added that the only time it would make some noise was when the water fell <br />below a certain level and would begin to fill up and then stop once the tank was filled, similar to <br />the system of a toilet bowl. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that a house remodel requires a building permit and inquired if the <br />installation of the tank required a building permit as well. Ms. Ainos replied that when the <br />Building and Safety Division reviewed the application, it determined that the applicant did not <br />need a building permit; only a conditional use permit was required. <br />Commissioner O'Connor indicated that he wanted to clarify the timing for the record and noted <br />Ms. Rocha's statement that she planted sequoia redwood trees, that the trees in the rear were <br />removed, and that the poly tank was installed. He asked Ms. Rocha if she has the approximate <br />date for when the tank was put in, the redwood trees were planted, and the trees at 455 Sycamore <br />Road were removed. Ms. Rocha replied that she did not know the date when the trees were <br />removed; however, she indicated that the tank was installed around May or June of last year after <br />she had completed the landscaping and was having problems with the water pressure, which was <br />the reason she had the tank installed right away so she could irrigate the landscaping. She added <br />that the redwood trees were planted immediately after because she wanted the extra screening for <br />the area as it was wide open, and it was shortly after she had planted the trees that the neighbors <br />chopped down the trees. <br />In response to Chair Blank's inquiry if Ms. Rocha had two places where she could put the poly <br />tank, Ms. Rocha replied that she could place the tank either on the right or the left side and that <br />she did not want to blatantly put it in front of somebody's house. Chair Blank inquired if it was <br />her belief at that time that if she put the tank where it is, it would be less disruptive than on the <br />other side. Ms. Rocha confirmed that was the case. <br />Commissioner Fox asked staff about different types of water tanks. She noted that the tank in <br />question was a lot taller than it was wide and inquired if there were underground water tanks or <br />elongated tanks that would be shorted and have a lower profile but would hold the same amount <br />of water. Ms. Decker replied that tanks come in all shapes and sizes and materials but that in a <br />use. where a pump actually discharges and fills a tank, the pressure tank would typically be <br />above-ground. She noted that it would not be the same tank that the City would put in, which is <br />oftentimes half-submerged but are also above-ground, such as that in the Vineyard Avenue <br />Specific Plan area. She explained that generally these tanks are purchased with the consideration <br />of getting the smallest tank to meet the needs because of the cost issue. <br />Ms. Decker continued that she wanted to clarify a point to dispel any thought that the well, the <br />casing, or the submersible pump, which were already located there, are part of this conditional <br />use permit. She noted that the conditional use permit only refers to the tank. She further <br />clarified that, referring to the point raised by Commissioner Fox regarding why the tank was not <br />replaced in the same location and of the same type, wooden tanks are no longer fabricated and <br />that even if the poly tank were placed in the same location, it would still require a conditional use <br />permit because it was not of the same type of material or size as the old tank. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Apri19, 2008 Page 6 of 15 <br />