Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. 1915 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ' <br />DECLARATION PREPARED FOR CASE RZ-80-10. <br />OF THE CTTX <br />'HE NEGATIVE <br />WHEREAS, Foothill Associates has applied to rezo e the approximately <br />9+ acre parcel located on Foothill Road south of <br />Foothill High School at Muirwood Drive outh from "A" <br />(Agricultural) District to the R-1-20,0 0 (Single- <br />Family Residential) District; and <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 112, 1980 at which <br />time all pertinent testimony and docume is were heard; and <br />WHEREAS, said proposal was based upon an Initial Study done pursuant <br />to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures <br />adopted by the City Council of the Cit of Pleasanton by <br />Resolution No. 77-66; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meetin of November 12, 1980 <br />received the initial Study and propose Negative Declaration <br />'-' in a report from the Director of Planning and Community <br />Development dated November 12, 1980 re arding the aforementioned <br />project; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised by <br />of its responsibilities in reviewing t] <br />{~eglaration and the determination requ: <br />of Resol~ltion No. `77-66; and <br />WHEREAS, each member of the Planning Commission <br />copies of Resolution No. 77-66 at the <br />the proposed environmental assessment, <br />been published in the Pleasanton Times <br />the public hearing on the aforemention~ <br />WHEREAS, upon receipt of the staff report and p~ <br />Planning Commission reviewed the provi; <br />Guidelines and Processing Procedures f~ <br />of projects and preparation of Environs <br />in order to determine if a Negative Deg <br />appropriate for the project and what m, <br />any, must be undertaken to ensure that <br />not have a significant impact upon the <br />the City Attorney <br />e proposed Negative <br />red by Section 5.4 (e) <br />had before him/her <br />ime of considering <br />which has previously <br />at the time of <br />d project; and <br />blic input, the <br />ions of the City's <br />r the evaluation <br />rental Impact Reports <br />~laration is <br />tigation measure, if <br />the project will <br />environment. <br />