My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1999
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 2:25:38 PM
Creation date
6/26/2008 8:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/1981
DOCUMENT NO
1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-81-2
NOTES
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP
NOTES 2
CONSTRUCT FOUR-STORY OFFICE BLDG.
NOTES 3
DUBLIN CYN RD AND FOOTHILL RD
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. 1999 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR A <br />PUD FOR FARMERS INSURANCE FILED UNDER CASE <br />PUD-81-2. <br />WHEREAS, Farmers Insurance Group has applied for a PUD (Planned <br />Unit Development-Commercial and Offices) site plan and <br />architectural approval for an approximately 148,000 sq. <br />ft., four-story office building and a 4,416 sq. ft, branch <br />claims office on an approximately 14 acre site located <br />on Dublin Canyon Road and the west side of Foothill Road, <br />near the intersection of I-580;- and <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 20, 1981 at which time <br />all pertinent testimony and documents were considered. <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City o£ Pleasanton <br />recommends approval of case PUD-81-2 subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />1. That the development be substantially as shown on the <br />development plan, Exhibit A, on file with the Planning <br />Division. <br />2. That approval of this case does not constitute approval <br />of the design of the branch claims office and that <br />separate plans shall be submitted to the Design Review <br />Board for approval prior to construction of that <br />building. <br />3. That the color of the structure, including the two <br />penthouses, shall be submitted to the Planning Division <br />for approval and that the composition of the penthouses <br />shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. <br />Said approvals are required prior to issuance of a <br />building permit. <br />4. That the applicant submit plans to the Fire Department <br />for the proposal under review. One set of plans <br />shall be retained by the Fire Prevention Bureau <br />for record purposes. <br />5. That the application as proposed will be subject <br />to additional requirements under the City Fire Code. <br />The applicant is requested to contact the Fire Pre- <br />vention Bureau for more detailed information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.