1847 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLATNING CObITfISSION CITY OF PLEASANTOTd COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION N0. 1847 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COI4PdISSIOId, CITY OF PLEASANTOI7, RECOMb7ENDING APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONA'IENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR JOHN AND JOAN CAROLIPIS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-80-1 WHEREAS, John and Joan Caroline have applied for development plan approval for a business park to be located on a 69 acre site on the south side of Valley Avenue and immediately easterly of the residences along Kolln Street; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned PUD-Industrial (Planned Unit Devel- opment-Industrial) District; and WHEREAS, an environmental impact report was completed in August, 1979, for this development plan; and WFIEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the environmental impact report which was prepared for this project at their meet- ing of February 13, 1980, to determine if the project would have any significant impacts in the environment, and if so, whether mitigation measures or overriding considerations may be present. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COPIIIISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOV7S: Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. That the Environmental Impact Report for the planned unit development has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. 2. That the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Environmental Impact Report prior to the approval of the project. 3. That the project would have significant adverse impacts on the environment pertaining to traffic safety at the Valley Avenue/"A" Drive intersection visual and accous- tical screen of the uses on the site from surrounding uses and water conservation, but that recommended con- ditions of approval of case PUD-80-1 would reduce those impacts to insignificant level. 4. That there are two significant adverse impacts of case PUD-80-1 which are not mitigatable (traffic increase on Valley Avenue and other access routes and impact on Valley Avenue-Santa Rita Road intersection) but that there are overriding social and economic considerations (more local jobs) which make infeasible all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report.