1866 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PL ASANTON COUNTY OF LAMEDA STATE OF C IFORNIA RESOLUTION'NO. 1866 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GATIVE DECLARATION FOR AMADOR VALLEY INVESTO S FOR THE PROJECT WHICH IS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-7 14. WHEREAS, Amador Valley Investors h s applied to rezone-from the R-1-6500 (Single-Family R sidential) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development District and development plan approval for a 34-lot sin le-family residential subdivision proposed to be constructe on a 9 acre parcel located on the south side of Fairlan s Drive opposite its intersection with Brockton Drive; and ', WHEREAS, said proposal was based u on an Initial Study done pursuant to the Environmental Impa t Guidelines and Procedures adopted by the City Counc 1 of the City of Pleasanton by Resolution No. 77-66; e nd WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, ~ t its meeting of April 9, 1980 received the Initial Stu and proposed Negative Declaration d in a report from the Dire for of Planning and Community Development dated April 9~ 1980 regarding the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission w s advised by the City Attorney of its responsibilities i reviewing the proposed Negative Declaration and the deter inations required by Section 5.4(e) of Resolution No. 7-66; and WHEREAS, each member of the Planni g Commission had before him/her copies of Resolution No. 7-66 at the time of considering the proposed environmenta assessment, which has previously been published in the Ple Banton Times, at the time of the public hearing on the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of the staff Planning Commission revie Guidelines and Processing of projects and preparati in order to determine if priate for the project an if any, must be undertake not have a significant im report and public input, the ed the provisions of the City's Procedures for the evaluation n of Environmental Impact Reports Negative Declaration is appro- what mitigation measures, to ensure that the project will act upon the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: ///