1733 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION N0. 1733 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING THAT GP-79-S, FILED BY STONESON DEVELOPMENT CO. FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT BE APPROVED. WHEREAS, Stoneson Development Co. has applied for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 91.5 acre site located at the southwest intersection of I-580 and I-680 from "High Density Residential", "Public and Institutional" and "Parks and Recreation" to "Commercial and Offices", "Public and Institutional", and'High Density Residential"; and PIHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review this application April 11, 1979; and WHEREAS, all pertinent reports, documents, maps and testimony were reviewed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after reviewing all available data concluded that the proposed change to the General Plan would be appropriate; and ~-WHEREAS, after reviewing the negative declaration, it was determined the significant adverse effects could be reduced to insignificance by conditioning the approval as described in the staff report submitted to the Planning Commission dated April 11, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the adoption of GP-79-5 as petitioned subject to the following conditions: 1. That the general plan designation of the subject property be changed to show 15-20 acres of "Public and Institutional;' 15-35 acres of "High Density Residential" and 30-45 acres of "Commercial and Offices" and that these uses may be located anywhere within the 91.5 acre site. 2. That the General Plan multiple-single family dwelling unit ratio be changed from 25%-75o to 20%-80%. 3. That in conjunction with the rezoning of the subject property, the applicant agree to carry out the traffic studies necessary to properly develop the site under its new land use designation and if these studies indicate a need for an interchange at I-680/Stoneridge Drive, to fund or participate in the funding of said interchange unless built entirely with state and/or "- federal monies. 4. That in conjunction with the design and location of the hospital and congregate housing, existing and projected noise