My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1616
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
1616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 2:53:22 PM
Creation date
6/23/2008 2:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/8/1978
DOCUMENT NO
1616
DOCUMENT NAME
UP-78-3
NOTES
JIMMIE AND FLOREAN KING
NOTES 2
OPERATE RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
NOTES 3
2445 VIA ESPADA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 1616 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY <br />OF PLEASANTON APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR <br />JIMMIE AND FLOREAN KING UNDER APPLICATION NO. UP-78-3. <br />WHEREAS, Jimmie and Florean King applied for a conditional use permit <br />to operate a residential care facility for no more than three <br />developmentally disabled adults at their home at 2445 Via <br />Espada; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-1-6500 (Single Family Residential) <br />District; and <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing to review this application was held on <br />March 8, 1978, when all pertinent maps, drawings, reports and <br />testimony were taken by the Planning Commission; and <br />WHEREAS, considerable opposition was registered by surrounding property <br />owners, who feared that the use would change the character of <br />their residential neighborhood; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Attorney advised them that Sections 5115 and 5116 of <br />the State of California Welfare and Institutions Code limits <br />the ability of local jurisdictions to make determinations as <br />to whether the use may or may not be permitted in a residential <br />area and unlike other conditional use permits, such a permit <br />as applied for under UP-78-3, cannot take into consideration <br />the effects on surrounding properties and that argument cannot <br />be used as a basis for imposing conditions on the application <br />which would be discriminatory to the use of the residence as a <br />residential care facility. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission approves the application filed <br />under UP-78-3, subject to the following conditions of approval: <br />1. That no more than three persons be boarded on the subject <br />site at any one time. <br />2. That the applicants meet all requirements of the State <br />Department of Health for the boarding and care of develop- <br />mentally disabled adults and that the use be licensed by <br />the State at all times. <br />3. That no special facilities for the boarders be installed <br />on the subject property without prior City approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.