Laserfiche WebLink
7.2. Fiscal Impact of Including Assisted Living Units in the Housing Cap Count <br />Impact on a Prospective Basis39 <br />The Initiative defines a housing unit to include any residences that have a kitchen (sink, <br />cooking device, and refrigerator) and a bathroom (toilet, tub or shower). The statement <br />of reasons section of the Initiative states that the Pleasanton definition of housing unit <br />should be consistent with the U.S. Census Bureau and State of California definitions <br />when calculating the housing cap. <br />Staff looked at development planned in the near future that, depending upon this <br />application of this definition, may trigger this section of the Initiative; the one project <br />identified is the Continuing Life Care (CLC) project planned for the Staples Ranch <br />property. CLC proposes to build 636 units that would include independent living units, <br />villas and apartments. To date, the City Council has indicated that 240 of the 636 units <br />would count towards the City's housing cap; however a final decision will not be made <br />on that issue until Council considers the PUD development plan for the CLC facility. In <br />the meantime, for other purposes, staff has been counting 240 units from CLC towards <br />the housing cap consistent with the Council's preliminary direction. <br />If, however, the Initiative were adopted and a11636 units were determined to fall within <br />the Initiative's definition of a "housing unit" and count toward the City's housing cap, <br />this would cause a reduction of an additional 396 units (that is, in addition to the 240 staff <br />has been counting) in the number of future housing units that could be developed in the <br />City under the housing cap. This would create a loss in annual net revenues to the City, <br />as well as upfront capital fees (development impact fees), as follows: <br />Table 9 <br />Housing Unit Assumptions: <br />Multifamily Unit~~~ <br />Single Family <br />Detached Unit~2~ <br />Floor Area: <br />Cost per square foot: <br />Estimated Market Value: <br />Person Per Household: ~3~ <br />900 square feet <br />$250 <br />$225,000 <br />2.0 <br />3,500 square feet <br />$350 <br />$1,225,000 <br />3.0 <br />(1) Based on Windstar Apartment Project: 350 units ranging from 576 square feet to 1,368 square feet; <br />of the 350 units 213 units are one bedroom/one bath, 130 are two bedrooms/two baths and 7 are three <br />bedrooms/three baths. <br />(2) Based on the Ironwood Project: 191 units ranging from 1,450 square feet to 5,091 square feet. <br />(3) Per State of California Department of Finance as of January 1, 2008: 2.753 persons per household in <br />Pleasanton. Per U.S. Census: owner occupied 2.87 persons per household and renter occupied 2.3 <br />persons per household. <br />Per 1996 General Plan: 3.09 persons per single family household and 2.05 persons per multifamily <br />household. <br />39 The analysis only considers the application of the definition of housing unit on a prospective basis <br />because the Initiative did not include specific language about retroactivity. <br />35 <br />