My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
061708
>
18 ATTACHMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:05:34 PM
Creation date
6/17/2008 4:37:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommended that it be further reduced to $1.5 million. This would put the <br />supplemental property tax revenue at the same level it was in 2001, after the last <br />economic recession. Actual supplemental property tax received in the 2005-06 <br />fiscal year was $2.4 million. <br />The property tax in-lieu of VLF was established by the state after permanently <br />reducing the VLF rate from 2% to 0.65% in 2004 as part of the triple-flip. This <br />replaces the revenue loss due to the reduction in the VLF rate with property tax <br />shifted from countywide ERAF and increases annually in proportion to the growth <br />in assessed valuation of the jurisdiction. Property tax in-lieu of VLF for 2008-09 <br />was originally projected to increase 6.5% over the original budget estimate. <br />Because the growth in assessed valuation is expected to be lower the estimate is <br />recommended to be reduced by $(57,894). <br />Sales Tax <br /> – Proposition 57, the California Economic Recovery Bond Act enacted <br />by voters in 2004, reallocated 25% of the 1% local sales tax and dedicated that <br />portion as a source of repayment for the State deficit reduction bond repayment. <br />As part of this action (the triple-flip), the State replaced the 25% portion of the <br />reallocated sales tax with an amount of ERAF property tax based on a formula <br />involving statewide sales tax growth and the change in county population. The <br />adjusted estimate was based on updated figures provided by the State <br />Controllers Office, and reflects a reduction of $(62,798) for the 25% portion. <br />The recommendation regarding the remaining 75% local portion of the sales tax <br />is to reduce the budget estimate by $(713,887). The 75% local portion of the <br />sales tax was originally projected to increase 2.5% for 2008-09, roughly in line <br />with the increase in inflation. However, the recommendation is now being <br />revised to a 0.0% increase. This takes into account that 2007-08 sales tax <br />receipts included 2 quarters of payments from auto dealers that relocated at the <br />end of calendar 2007. Also, the recommended adjustment assumes a general <br />decline of 3% to 5% in the auto & transportation and building & construction <br />categories generally. <br />Development Services Fees <br />- Development Services fees are comprised of the <br />various building permit fees (building, electrical, plumbing, HVAC), planning & <br />zoning fees, plan check fees, and public works fees. <br />The initial projection for building permit fees for 2007-08 was $2.2 million, but <br />was revised downward to $1.5 million during the mid-year review. The original <br />revenue projection for 2008-09 was $2.3 million and is recommended to be <br />reduced to $1.6 million. Actual collections in 2006-07 were $1.9 million. <br />The recommended adjustment to planning fees is primarily a reduction in the <br />amount budgeted for contract planning services. Based on 2007-08 YTD <br />experience it is recommended that planning fees be reduced from $444,241 to <br />$152,385. <br />è <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.