My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENT 05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
061708
>
20 ATTACHMENT 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2008 8:25:50 AM
Creation date
6/13/2008 8:25:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/17/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENT 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
were not typically done, although the applicant is willing to do so only because it absorbs the <br />heat from sun as it stands in the open. <br />Ms. Decker stated that using materials other than planting for screening sometimes makes <br />something that is not so visible much more visible with the addition of fencing, lattice, or other <br />structures. With respect to mitigation with 25-gallon shrubs, she noted that the largest shrubs are <br />15 gallons, which is a tree size. She noted that shrubs generally establish better five gallons. <br />She added that if mitigation were being considered by the Commission, she would like to suggest <br />language such as "The applicant shall consider planting shrubs to screen the tank with such <br />plantings that would be not be harmful to the health of the stock, subject to the review and <br />approval of the Director of Planning and Community Development." <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that as a former painting contractor, although the tank <br />could be painted with the proper type of painting preparation, these tanks are meant to be low <br />maintenance and do not need to be painted. He stated that applying paint would result in <br />ongoing maintenance issues, and if the tank were not property maintained, the paint could crack <br />and peel through the years. <br />Chair Blank noted that when he had things painted, with the proper preparation of the surface, to <br />the right kind of painting on the surface, the paint could last for a long time with low <br />maintenance. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that his comment was meant to call the Commission's attention <br />to the maintenance issue. He added that he did not think painting the tank brown as mentioned <br />by Ms. Decker would be a big improvement. <br />In response to Ms. Decker comment about 25-gallon bushes not being available, Commissioner <br />Narum commented that she thought that the plants specified for the Sarich property were <br />60 gallons in size. <br />Ms. Decker clarified that those were box sizes. She stated that trees generally come in one-, <br />five-, 15-, 24-, and 36-inch boxes. She added that trees that come in the 24-inch box had a trunk <br />diameter of 1 to 1 '/2 inches, with the trunk getting larger as the box gets larger. She noted that <br />the larger the plant material installed, the longer it takes to establish the root system; the younger <br />variety would a little bit more quickly and would catch up within a year or so. She further stated <br />that the applicant had expressed concern not only about the cost for putting in appropriate size <br />shrubs or shrub materials but also the fact that stock is in the field and that there is very small <br />range of materials that would not be harmful to the stock. Ms. Decker proposed that the <br />Commission not specify the type of shrubs at this time so that staff may be able to work with the <br />applicant on what would be best for the site. <br />Chair Blank proposed an amendment to the motion to adopt the language proposed by <br />Ms. Decker in terms of planting the shrubbery around the tank. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 9, 2008 Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.